HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-02-09; Planning Commission; Resolution 148I
t e (I)
P
2
3
4
I
5
3:ESQLL'TIOK NO. 148
A -7E:SOLCTION 9F THE CARLSEA!: CITY
37 1 u;+L~xIT<G .I 7- CC)L&':ISSICN CZSYING RECSfi:SSI-
FIcLiyx(7x CT CEBT.'LIN E~s:~&4,'r~E I'xcp<:RTy
y< .rH- ZIpy SF (-"-?:Lsz;:~Lc rr'RZp: ZZXE x-1
fO;{E-yA5&IJ>y v;srcl.xTrL\Lj To K-3 (>;iTiT?PLE-
F~'l).;i'Ly x<SzCENT:P,r,) .
6
8
hereby resolve as follows: 7
The Czrlsbac! City Plsnning Comission or' the City of Carlsbad tioes
i;r. , ..--.-..s, :? 2 0 .? there was filed yvc;-;;h th.is Ccmnissioi; 3r? the 26th day 3€ Jar
9 1968, an appIicstisn by Finis .3., J~hnson requestiing a change of zone cia:
10 cqtion unrier the p1(3t7ir;i13~.s ,23f Srdi~anice No. 986C; and
11 m",r;R.sAS, the CarlslYed ,City ?laming Comxission did publish a legal r
12
13
of hearing cp, Janusry 28, 1969, oi' a hsc7riEg to be he?$. on February ?, !.I
(~ultip?e-~a.~i1y Resfdentiai) p of that property deszr:bes as: 17
consider reciassificstion from Zone R-i (One-FzxiIy ?.ssidential) to Zone 16
February, 1960, hold a duly advertised public hezring as p--r~~py~ LLaLL:bed by lr 15
\dHE::h%iiS, the *Carlsbzc! City Pl.arrr.ing Comrission did cin the 9th day 0: 14
at 7 :33 P,M. ; an6
18
19
20
21
22
Property lccated north of Laguna Avenue
between Buena Vist3. Gardens and Jefferson
all of Parcel 12, Tax Assess~r's Book 35,
Page 171, af Sa?& Diego County, 2nd all OE
Par:e!s 11-A and 11-X!, Tax Assessor's Book
therefrom the eastzrly 1.50 feet of said
Str-* cct, Tore particularly described cs
35, Page 171, of Sap. 2i0g0 Coci?.ty, e~~e~~ing
Parcels 11-A ~3 Il-Xl e
23
general plan a-d 5e de~rinenta! :o the propsr"iy 2nd inprovemeats 26
1, Rezoning this propsrty would adverssly affzc'. the corn?rehen~i-~*e 25
described prop.~rLy be denied for ths following ~2asons: 24
SOW, TEEREFORE, BZ ZT XIESOiVED, irhac thz reclassification of the abc
27 in the vfcini~y, as i'i smgld block futur? devslopmfnt of t5e
28 lmg parcels to the north.
29 2. It is in the best intz'r-.s';s cf :;:?e City that no rezxning to R-3
30 I/ be grected ur?'~il such Eixe as ar: acceptable precise plan can be
31
32
pYEsS??tEd to the c3iT::.1:iSS io?..
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
52
I - .
I
If
e e
pAS:.;1;C, -~pp2~$LC .iND A?CspT53 at a regular neetip.g of :he CarIsb.36 Cit
Planning Commission held ca Lh.2 9th day cf February, 1960, by the followin
vote, to vlt :
AYLS: Chai-l-man Sr~-i>ger~ Eo;m.issioncrs Necks, Zahler, Xard9 ‘Thomas,
KiIlsr 2nd Jarvie,
NOES : None *
AZSENT : Noz~~
/.-fly@[/ J,~g-”-~
,.”,, . ,” ,” ., c /&75~
/ e’ - ,. Chi m.zn
AT‘T :<ST :
\)jS” -
3 .-a TXZCE, Secrztaz-y
-2-