Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-09-13; Planning Commission; Resolution 177I/ '. m, ' : .. W , .. ,. ,. .. .. 1 2 3 4 5 . .. .. ~~:soLuTIoi\r NO. 177 . .. . A RXSOLUTIiiN 'OF THE C,-lXLSBhrD CITY ' . PLAN.NING COMMISSION MECOMP.IENDING RECL~,,SSIFICsTION OF CER'iXIN DEsLGNhTED 1 'PROgERTY IN THE' CITY OF C,WLSBiB FRCM ZONE R-1-15000 (ON2 F.;.iVliLj! i3SLDENTllriL7 RESIDENTIAL, 10000; sq,. ft.1 ,15000 sq. ft.) TO 'E-1-10000 ( .ONE GMILY I .I .I 1 ! 1 6 (1, . The Caflsbad C'ity klanning Commission of It& City of Carlsbad does 'hereby 7 11 resolve as fpllows:. .. 8 WHEREAS, there was filed with this Comrnission.on the 17th day 'of jiugust, .. 9 1960, 'an application by Arthur 'W. Glissman reqquesting a change of zone- ' lo Classification under the provisions of Ordinance No. '9060; and l1 I/ WHEiEAS, the'.Carlsbad.City 2linning Commission did on the 13th day of .. l2 l5 15000 sq. ft.) to Zone 'K-l-hOOOO (One Family Residential, 10000 sq. ft.) of l4 ' to consider reclassification from Zone B-1-15000 (one Family Residential, l3 September, 1960, hold .a'iiuly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law , ' Portion of tax Assessor's Lot 1 of Rancho Agua Nedionda and l6 'that property descr.ibed as: .. .I .'portion of Lot 1 Bellavista, Page 9, sheets 1 and 2 and Page 17 10, sheet 2, Book.35'.of the hssessor's.Map~~2152 in the.Cit)i .. .. of- Carlsbad, .. 18 and 19 20 21 .. 'iJHERE[&, the Planning Commission has found the following. facts to eiist: 1. That the granting of such .reclassifica,tion will not;. be materially ,' I. 22 23 detrimental to the public cjelfare or injurious ;o the property or improve- rnents in s,uch vicin,ity .and zcme in which the property is LocaCed, 2. That such reclassification is necessary for'the preservation and enjoy- ment of a substan'ti.al property' right possessed by other property in the szme vi- cinity and zone but which is denied' to the property'in queition, 24 25 26 27 .' .. 3. That the granting of' this request will not adversely af f&t the '2a I/ comprehensive general plan. 4. There were no objections or protests to.such rezoning, NOW, THXREFOEE, BE.IT KESOLVED, that the reclassification .of the above . 29 30 .1 31 32 described property is .hereby recommended t,o be approved as submitredr ,a:, .. ., .. --- - ". .. i ,. I, '. . I <. I 1 !W W 1 ZASSEL L'.~~-t~XVl-'3 ,!dD ADOPTGD at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City ' 4 prescribed. by l-avlm .. 3 AND FIF: ~'<,:i<Y XSOLVED, that a Copy of this Eesolution be forwarde'd to the 2 City Council of the City of Carlsbad, for .its attention in the manner 5 vote, to wit: 6 ?lanning Co~~n\iss?.on held on the 13th day of September, 1960, by the follo.r-ting 7 AYES: Cksir-rnan Jarvie, Commissioners Davis, KistlerD HardtJick, Hughes 8 and lziardb 9 NOES : !\TOP c I. 10 . ,?$S''"'T' "qissioner Grant .I. 1 :,;I \-9 < 12 , ,A,>\; r \& -0 . L- .- 13 14 CHI., ;zs t,,N ATT.EST: 15 -\N-- % FBICE, Secretary 16 17 ~ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 I- t I I I I I ~ I ~ ~ I .. ..