HomeMy WebLinkAbout1960-11-09; Planning Commission; Resolution 186.-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7'
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
w W
RESOLUTION No, 186
RESOLUTIOIV OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLMNING
COblMISSION RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT TO
ORDINANCE. NO, 9060 BY CWLNGING ZONE FROM .. R-1-15000 Sq. ft TO ZONE R-T AND FROM ZONE
.R-A TO ZONE C-2 OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED
AS LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK I), BELL4 VISTA TRACT
AND A PORTION OF LOT I RANCHO AGUA HEDIONDA,
BEING A PART OF TAX ASSESSOR'S BOOK 35, PAGE
105, FMCEL 7,.OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIBGO.
CJHEREAS, said P.lanning Commission did on the 25th day of OQtOber; 1960
adopt.Resolution of Intention No. 18 to amend Ordinance No. 9060; and
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission did on the 9th day Qf November, 1960,
'hold a duly advertised' public hearing as prescribed. by .law to consider' an '
amendment to Ordinance No, 9060 to change from R-A to C-2 the following
described propertfr within the City of Carlsbad:
The southeasterly,corner of.the entjre parcel in Tax Assessor's
' Book 35, Fage 105, Parcel 7, measuring appr0,ximately 300 ft. on
the easterly side, 175 Et. on the southerly side, 275 ft, on
the westerly side and 175 ft. on the northerly side
and to change f.rom R-1-15,000 sqa ft. to X-T the following described property
within the City :of Carlsbad:
'Lots 10 and 11, Block D. Bella Vista Tract,
and to change
The remainder of that portion,of Lot I, Rancho,hgua Hedionda, as shown
in Tax Assessor's Book 35, Page 105, Parcel 7, of the County of
San Diego
from R-A-10,000 sq. ft to R-T and
. .' WHEREXS, said Planning Commission has found the following facts to
exist: .. ..
.I
1. That such reclassification wil.1 not be materially 'detrimental
to the public welfare or injur&ous to the property or improvements in
such vicinity and zone. in qhich the property is located,
..2, . That the reclassification wi.11 not adversely affect the comprehensive
general plan.
3. a project of this type is the best use to which land of this type .
could be put,
' ll e : w.
1 land .. ,
2
3
4
5
6
7 commercial shopping center in the middle .af'very high priced residential lots,
8
9 described prope::ty is hereby recommended to be approved as em'ended.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found the request for change in zone from .
R-1-15000 sq; ft. to C-1 not to be feasible for the following reasons:
1. Several areas in the City,of Carlsbad already exist for the servicing
of these lots.
2. This appears to be spot zoning in that it would be.placing a small
NOW, TREREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the reclassification of the above
lo I1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting, of the Carlsbad City
11 lanning Commission held on the 25th day of Ocbober, 1960 by the fal1owin.g
12 ote, to wit:
13
14 I AYES: Commissioners Davis, Grant, Ward and Hughes
NOES: Chairman Jarvie
15 I/ ABSTAXN: Commissioner Hardwick ..
16 11 ABSENT: Commissioner .Kistler
17
18
. .' "1 ' .
chai9n
I. .
1 '. ,,y\,c, ' , 6 . 4 .- j-\,\," , L ; . - " , -\w .A
>
L
l9 20 I=T:
PRICE, Secretary 2lr 22 23 ''
Note: This Resolution failed to pass for lack of a majority vote,
24
25
26
27
28
,29
30
31
32
.~
II ' ' i
T
Y
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
e 1)
NOW, THEREFOX, BE IT RESOLVED that the reclassification of the abov
described property is hereby recommended to be approved:
AND FINALLY RESULVZD, that a copy of this Resolution be forwarded tc
the City Cauneil ~QP itg attention i~ the *BMM @2ege?.ibed by law.
PASSED,' APPKOVED AND ADOjTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad
City Planning Commission held on the 9th day of November, 1960 by the fol
vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Jarvie, Commissioners Davis, Hardwick, Kistler, Warc
NOES: None
Hughes
1 ABSENT: Comnissioner Grant. 1
11
12
13 ATTEST:
1
14
H. PRICE, Secretary
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31 I
32
I