HomeMy WebLinkAbout1961-02-14; Planning Commission; Resolution 197li *
P
e
-. 1 KaS(3;LUTIC;N NO. 197
2'
AS 6, I'GRTION GF LCT 7, BLOCK A, >.,LLES b.VO&'$DO 3
). ZESOLUTIOi\! C.F TEE C:&SB-iiD CITY >,LlbTNING tax-
KI~SION G~.;.~.:~IT;<G -A- IJ.!~RI.L~;;.EZ: ~JN p3j,cL ZR-ry DESC;~.LB~:D
la I1 ACRES, RXSUBGZVISICjN, ACCOi<CixG TO +I.'>&;" 2027, IN
TtiE CITY CiF C:?&LS3-3.
t5 11 18-?ERE.ASI Mesley 0. Denison did apply ~QK a val;ia,nce for Eduction of
6 I ard set back from 20 feet to 10 feet on property located on the south sid IIY ' '?ah Avenue between Harding and'Madison Streets, said property beirg nore 1
8
according to a Mep 2027, in the city of Carlsbad; and 9
larly described as a portion of Lot 7, Block A. Alles .$vocado Acres, Resubc
10 XHEFWiS, the CarlsbEd. City T13,nning. Conmission did'publish g. legal no
'1 of hearing on February 2, 1961, of a hearing to be held on February 14, 19,
I2 at 7:30 ?.Pi,; 2nd
13
14
:+E'p" ,. L;LL!-L-,, I 7 there were no protests registered by the surroun6,ing propert,
15
LvGW ~ .y ; j-"qj>,E, 4 111 _1 ;i, 2 1-r ii 1:- - - -
for the following reasons:
16
rkust:i.VED, tket the verience be approved 8,s requ
(1) Grenting the variance will permit the land to be used to its
I? il fullest and best econonic use as this is in am R-2 zone.
l8 I1 (2) Granting this variance will not ad.vcrsely effect the con-
19
20
prehensive general plar, or be detrimental to thz property and
improvements in the vicinity.
21
22
(3) There were no oral or written protests by the surrounding
property owners.
23 ?&SED, Al?I.RC;VES &<E AEO?TBD at a regular meeting of the Carlsb8.d Cit:
24 Flanning Commission held or: Lhe 14th day of February, 1961, by the followi.
25 // vote, to wit:
26
28
27
AYES: Ch2.irma.n Jsrvie, Comissionnrs Ezrdwick, Kistler, Grant, Sad
29
3o ATTEST :
Bughes
NOES : None
I.,BSSNT: ' Comissioner Davis.
m. PiiICE, Secretary I/ . JJ