HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-02-13; Planning Commission; Resolution 235c 8 li 6 d .-..-. /, . i L: i. L , ""., 1,
. .'
1
2
3
4 1,
5
6
?I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
29
30
31
32
RESOLUTION NO. 235
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING RECLASSIFICATION
FROM R-1 TO ZONES R.3 AND CUI OF CERTAIN
DESIGNATED PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF GARLSBAD
The Carlsbad City Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad does
hereby resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 23rd day of January,
adopt Resolution of Intention No. 26, to amend Ordinance No. 9060; and
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission did on the 13th day of Februar
hold a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law to consider ar
amendment to Ordinance No. 9060 on property described as follows:
From Zone R-1 to R-3
Portion of Alles A.vocado Acres Resubdivision, Block B 9 Map No. 20
Book 204, Page 222, parcels 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, and Book 205, Pag
parcels 1, 7 and 8 sf the Assessor's Map of San Diego County; Tract
Thum Lands, parcels No. 2, 3, 4 and 20, Book 205, Page 270 of the
Assessor's Map of San Diego County; and Tract 237, Map 1681 , Thur
Book 206 p Page 050, Parcels 4, 5 and 6 of the Assessor's Map of Sa
County.
From Zone R-1 to C -I
The westerly 225' of parcels 1 and portion of 2 'combined, Book 206,
050 of the Assessor's Map of San Diego County having a line drawn p;
with and distant 225' perpendicular from the easterly right-of-way lij
Pi0 Pic0 Drive and 376' 3.- southerly of Tamarack.
The balance of Lot 2 is to be R-3 excepting the 105' westerly and par
the westerLy right-of-way of Adams Street which is to remain R-1.
and
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission has found the following facts t
1. That the granting of this zone reclassification from R-1 to R-3 w(
act as a buffer strip between the R-1 and C-1 zone.
2. That it .would enable development to attract tourist traffic off the
101 Freeway into Carlsbad.
3. That such reclassification will not adversely affect the comprehel
general plan.
4. That it would be the best usage of the land and would be compatib:
surrounding property.
5. That it is advantageous to rezone before other development of SUI
6 ..- - d
1 1 property would make this zoning incompatible.
2
3
4
5
6
7
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said amendment to Ord:
No. 9060 is hereby recommended to be approved. ..
AND FIN+LLY RESOLVED, that a COPY of this Re,solution be forwar,
the City Council for its attention in the manner prescribed by law'.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at.a regular m,eeting of the p1
Commission held on the 13th day of February, 1962 by the following vote
8 A YES: Commissioners .Davis, Neiswender ~ Kistler , Grant, Hughes Jarvie and Ward., 9
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
27
28
29
30
31
32
It
" 2 3-