HomeMy WebLinkAbout1962-05-08; Planning Commission; Resolution 244I/ //
il 0 0
1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY 2
RESOLUTION NO. 244
WHEREAS, ROBERT 0. AND EDYTHE HALL did apply for a variance 5
CARLSBAD. 8 1 t MAP 486, SUNNY SLOPE TRACT IN THE GITY OF ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS PORTION OF BLOCK 3 PLANNING COMMISSION GRANTING A VARIANCE
6'
9
Drive and Knowles Avenue, more particularly described as Lots 3 % 4 % 5 t 8
a 'lot split on property located on the east side of 'Jefferson between Lagun 7
allow a seduction in required frontage from 75 feet to 50 feet in order to (
and portion of Lots 13 and 14 in Block 1, Map 486 T Sunny Slope Tract in t;
10 of Carlsbad; said property being Parcels 10 and 11, Book 155, Page 260 c
11 Assessor's Map of San Diego County; and
12 WHEREAS, The Carlsbad City Planning Commission did publish a leg
13
at 7:30 P.M.; and 3.4
notice of hearing on ApriL 12, 1962, of a hearing to be held on April 24, 1
15 WHEREAS, The Carlsbad City Planning Commission did not hold a he
96 on April, 24, 1962, at 7:30 P.M., due to lack of a quorum; and
17 WHEREAS, The Carlsbad City Planning Commission did hold a hearin
18 May 8, 1962; and
19 WHEREAS, at said public hearing the said Planning Commission rece
20
parties who desired to be heard; 21
the recommendations t objections, protests and comments of all individual
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the request for said vari;
23
zone but which is denied to the property in question. 26
substantial, property right possessed by other property in the same vicinit 25
1. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyme: 24
granted for the following reasons:
and zone in which the property is located. 29
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vi 28
2, That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimen, 27
30
31
32
i
I1 0 e I/ !
1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Ca 5
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval of the application be ; 3
3. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the c
2 hensive general plan.
4 to the monumentation as required by the City Engineer.
6 1 Gity Plantling Commission held on the 8th day sf May ~ 1962 by chs ~oII.~~
7 1) vote, to wit:
8i AYES: Commissioners Davis 9 Ewald, Grant, Palmer, Jarvie and W;
9 NOES: None
10 ABSENT: None
11
12
l3 I
I* I
l5 I ATTEST:
&
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
-2 -
if