HomeMy WebLinkAbout1963-11-12; Planning Commission; Resolution 323i I1 i c f
1
2
3
4
5
RESOLUTION NO. 323
A RESOLUTION OF THICCARLSBAD CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION GRANTING A "PANHANDLE" LOT SPLIT
ON A PORTION OF TRACT 239, TWUM LANDS. MAP 1681, AND CONSOLIDATION OF LOT 10 OF GHESTNCT MANOR SUBDIVISION, MAP 5q.7.3, AS SHOWN ON ZXEiIBIT "A"
ATTACHED HERETO,'IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORN
. ..
..
6
Street and Highland Drive, more particularly described as a portion of 1: 9
on property located on the southerly side of Basswood Avenue between Ad 8
in required frontage from 60' to 23.03' in order to create a "Panhandle" 7
WHEREAS, H. VON PACKARD did apply for a variance to allow a rec
10 239, Thum Lands, Map 1681; and consolidation of Lot 10 in Chestnut Mx
us a portion of Tract 239, Thum Lands, Map 1
wn on Exhibit "A", in the City of Carlsbad, Ca!
sor's Parcel 9, Book 205, Page 120 and Asses
Parcel 10, Book 205, Page 360 of the Assessor's Map of San Diego Coun
WHEREAS, the Carlsbad City Planning Commission gave notice of pi
hearing on said variances by mailing a written notice not less than ten d:
prior to the date of such hearing to the last known addresses of the owne
property within a radius of 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the sub,
WHEREAS, the Carlsbad City Planfiing Commission did hold a hearil
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the said Planning Commission rec
mendations, objections, protests and comments of all individc
o desired to be heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commissi
onsideration does hereby grant the lot splits and consolidatio.
y applicant and as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
corporating herein. Parcel "A", as shown thereon shall be
g Lot 10 of Chestnut Manor Subdivision, plus a portion of T
ands , Map 1681 as shown on Exhibit "A". Said lot splits a
s are hereby granted on condition that all requirements or
the City "Panhandle" lot split Policies be met by applicani
that said new lots be surveyed and monumented and that reports thereof
furnished to the City;
'.
4 I( c e
t
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the request €or said variances be
.. . ..
1. That this reduction in width is in agreement with the "Panhandle"
2. That it would open up a highly desirable building site.
3. That the granting .. of such variance will not be materially detrime
e property or improvements in such 7
PASSED, APPRQVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Ca
day of November, 1963, by tlr
AYES: Commissioners Davis, Palmer, Jarvie, Lamb and Sonneman
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners Ward and Grant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
-2 -
I