Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-03-10; Planning Commission; Resolution 3411 !I * e I 1 RESOLUTION NO. 341 2 I/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING RECLASSIFICATION OF 311 CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF GA,RLSBAD, STATE OF GALIFORNU FROM ZQNE Rm1IIO 4 The Garlsbad City Planning Cornmission of the City of Carlsbad does I 5 TO R-1-7.5; 6 resolve as follows: 7 WHEREAS, these was filed with this Cornmission on the 25th day of 8 of zone classification under the provisions of Ordinance No. 9060: and 9 February, 1964, an application by Briggs Land Corporation requesting a t 10 WHEREAS, the Carlsbad City Planning Commission did on the 10th da: 11 I Agua Hedionda, Map 823 and Lot 1 in Block F, Bellavista, Map 16 Portions of Lots 66, 67, 68, 69, 71, 73, 74 and 75, Carlsbad 15 side of Park Drive of the following described property: 14 (Single-family Residential Zone} on 61.64 acres 'of property on the Southe; 13 reclassification from Zone R-1-10 (Single-family Residential) to R-1-7.5 12 March, 1964, hold a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law t Highlands No. 2, Map 2825 and those portions of Lot I of Rancho 2152 in the City of Carlsbad; being Parcel 1, Book 207, Page 100 Assessor's Map of San Diego County, more particularly described 17 and Parcels 2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 15, Book 207, Page 081 of the 18 on Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and 19 WHEREAS, the Car1sh;ad City Planning Commission has found the follc 20 facts to exist: 21 2. That the nearness to the lagoon warrants a smaller lot size. 22 1. That the adjoining large piece of property is zcmd Ryl-7.5. .2 3 3. That there was no opposition. 24 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the reclassification of th 26 topography. 25 4. That it would allow the proper development of the property due to t' 31 scribed by law. 30 the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, for its attention in the manner pr 29 AND FINALLY RESOLVED, that a copy of this Resolution be forwarde 28 above described property is :hereby recommended to be approved as submi: 32 i i I il L v 0 6 1. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Car 2 vote t to wit: 3 City Planning Comn?ission held on the 10th day of March, 1964, by the fol 4 NOES: None 3 5 AYES: Commissioners Davis, Ward, Grant, Palmer, Jarvie and Lax 6 ABSENT: Commissioner Sonneman. 71 8 9 3.0 ATTEST: u -2-