HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-03-10; Planning Commission; Resolution 343I I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.2 3
26 I
25 24~ I
27
28
29
30
31
32
1
i t
I' b e
i i
RESOLUTION NC. 343 .-..
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION DENYING A VARIANCE FOR REDUGTION IN FRONTAGE IN ORDER TO CREATE A "PANHANDLE"
LOT SPLIT ON CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY IN
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, STATE 8%' CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS,s JANE HUNT did apply for a variance to allow a reduction
frontage from 60 feet to 37 feet in order to create a "panhandle" lot split
property located on the South side of Knowles Avenue between Pi0 Pic0 D:
and Elmwood Street, being portion of Lot 27, Carlsbad Lands, Tract 117
1661 of the City of Carlsbad, being Parcel 6, Book 156 , Page 160 of the
Assessor's Map of San Diego County more particularly described as folk
B e ginnin
North 89 %
retracing
from said
at the Northeast corner of Tract 1 17, Map No. 166 1; thenl'c
57' WesL964.43 feet to a point designated as point A; thenc South 89 57' East to a point North 89O 57.'. Nest 858.85 fee
Nor%heasterLy corner sf Tract 117; thence North 0 56' Wes
340.42 feet to TRUE POINTOO% BEGINNING; thence North 0°55' Wesl
320.46 feet; thence South 89 42' 15" West to a line bearing North Oo
09AWest from point A; thence South Oo 09' East to a line bearing Soul
89 52' 38" West from TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 8'
52' 38" East to TRUE POINT OF BEGINNmG /excepting street/ in Northeast one quarter of Northwest one quarter of Section 6, Townshi
12, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; and
WHEREAS, the Carlsbad City Planning Commission gk3e do2kce cofiLp!r
he%.gJ.on said variance by mailing a written notice not less than ten dal
to the date of such hearing to the last known addresses of the owners of *
within a radius of 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject prop
WHEREAS, the Carlsbad City Planning Commission did hold a heari
March 10, 1964, at 7:30 P.M.; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the said Planning Commission rec
the recommendations, objections, protests and comments of all individc
parties who desired to be heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the request for said va
be denied for the following reasons:
1. That the use of the "panhandle" lot split policy does not apply si
there is another possible solution.
2. That there is an indication that a new street is to be in back oE '
which will allow the best usage of the property.
3. That there are no extraordinary circumstances or condtions apy
to the property.
I ). 'y)
I
11, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
2
3
Carisbad City Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March, 1964,
AYES: Commissioners Davis, Ward, Grant, Palmer, Jarvie and Lam 4
following vote, to wit:
5!
NOES: None.
6 ABSENT: Commissioner Sonneman. /
7
a
9
/ Agf-&/&e
0 , alrx
1011 ATTEST:
-2-
ii
4