Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-01-12; Planning Commission; Resolution 384.. * * 1 2 3 4 5 6! - PLANNING COMR/U;SSION RESOLUTION NO. 384 A RESOLUTION DENYING APPLICATION FOR PROPERTY AT SOUTH CARLSBAD ANNEXATION NO. 1.5 LYING NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY - " CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1 to C-M & M ON NO. -33Q. " _1_ WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 9060, the P1; ning Commission did on January 12, 1965, hold a duly noticed public hear 8 711 l to consider the application of LAWSON MARTINEAU, ET AL for a change g zone from R-1 to C-M on real property in the City of Carlsbad, County of 90 Diego, State of California, lying Easterly and adjacent to Ponto Drive; ant 13. a change of zone from R-1 to "M" (Industrial) on the balance of the proper 12 included in South Carlsbad Annexation No. 1.5, lying North of County Roa I 13 11 Survey No. 339, on the following described property: 14 I/ 3.5 'I l6 1 I.7 I That property known as "South Carlsbad Annexation No. 1.5", in the City of Carlsbad; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering the t I 18 20 Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist which make tl 19 mony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, said sions and general purpose of Ordinance No. 9060: 21 denial of the application for change of zone necessary to carry out the pro' 22 1. The requested zoning would be incompatible with future use of this 23 /I and adjacent land. 24 4. Allowing the reque'sted rezone would be detrimental to surrounding 28 I will become a local street. 27 3. The new freeway will be east of the property and the present freew' 26 will someday be a harbor with an ocean opening. 25 2. The property is very close to the Los Batiquitos Lagoon area whicl I 29 ! perty in relation to its highest and best use. 30 31 32 *. 1 .- a e ID NQWa THEBEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission ( the City of Carlsbad that it does hereby deny the application for change of 5 on said property. PASSED, APPROT6EDj AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Ca bad City Planning Commission held on the 12th day of January, 1965, by tl: following vote, to wit: AYES: Commissioners Palmateer, Grant, Sutherland and Lamb. 8 9 3.0 13. 312 13 s& 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2E 25 3( 3’ 1 I L I i. /c NOES: Commissioners McComas and Freistadt. ABSENT: Commissioner McCarthy. STTEST: - -2- 32