HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-12-28; Planning Commission; Resolution 417U e 0 ll
1
3
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY 2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 417
WESTERLY OF HIGHLAND DRIVE, NORTH OF BUENA VISTA WAY.
4 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 9061
5
7'
public hearing to consider the application of the CITY ,OF CAR 6
PlanniFg Commission did on December 28, 1965, hold a duly not
frontage from 70 feet to 50 feet on Parcel 1 located Northerl, 9
area from 7500 square feet to 7128 square feet, ,and reduction 8
for a variance for the purpose of a reduction in the required
lo proposed La's Flores Drive, Westerly of Highland Drive; also a
l1 reduction in lot frontage from 70 feet to 67.89 feet on corne
I.!2 Parcel No. 6 located Southerly of proposed Las Flores Drive a
l3l1 tliesterly of Highland Drive on real property in the City of Ca
l4l County of San Diego, State of California, commonly known as iiu'
l5 of Highland Drive, North of Buena Vista Way, and more particu
16 as:
'I
17
18
19
20
21
22
Portion of Tract 5 of Laguna Mesa Tracts9 according to Map 1719 and a portion of the Southeasterly one-quarter of Section 31', .Township 11 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the. City of Carlsbad; being Parcel 1 and Parcel 6 of Tentative Map (Parcel Plap) adopted by Carlsbad City Planning Comrnission Resolution No. 413 and Carlsbad City Council Resolution No. 1202;
WHEREAS, ,at said public hearing, upon hearing and consic
.2 3 the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desir
24 be heard, said Commission did find the following facts and re
25 to exist which make the. granting of a variance necessary to (
26 out the provisions and general purpose of Ordinance No. 9060:
28 271 the property that do not apply. generally to the other proper1
29
30
31
1. That there are exceptional circumstances that apply
the same vicinity.
2. That such variance is necessary for the preservatiol
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
32 1' erty in the same vicinity but which is denied to the propert!
1 question. I
1. I C (llI
11 3. That the granting of .s'uch variance will not be materi
2
located. 4
improvements in such vicinity and- zone in which the property i 3
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the' propert)
5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission 7
affect the- comprehensive, general plan. 6
4. That the. granting of such variance will not adversely
8 the City of Carlsbad that it does hereby grant a variance on s
91
lo
property for the purpose of a reduction in the required lot ar
from 7500 square feet to 7128 square feet, and reduction in IC
'I frontage from 70 feet to 50 feet on Parcel 1 located Northerlg
I,2 proposed Las Flores Drive and Westerly of Highland Drive; also
reduction in lot frontage from 70 feet to 67.89 feet on corner
x* Parcel No. 6 located Southe'rly of proposed La's Flores Drive an
151 Westerly on Highland Drive.
16 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
I? bad City Planning Commission held on the 28rth day of December,
18 by -the followipg voteg to wit:
I
i l3 I I
19
20
21
22
.2 3
AYES: Commissioners Palmateer, McCarthy, Sutherland, McC
NOES : None
ABSENT: Commissioners Munn and Lamb
and Freistadt.
^I ,
z4 I I
25i 1 ATTEST: /
26il 27 (-&$A$;--
28
29
30
31
34 I1
i
I
I
It
i