HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-08-08; Planning Commission; Resolution 514I
1 I; i 0' * I I j 1 I
1.
2
3
*! I
5l
PLANNING COMMI'SS'ION RESOL1lTI'ON NO.' 51 4
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY AT 131'0 XHUPAROSA WAY, AT THE NORTHWESTERLY .CORNER 'OF CWUPAROSAKWAY AND 'LA'S FLORE'S 'DRIVE.. '.' ' ' . ' '
MHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 906C
Planning Commission did on .August'8, 1967, hold a duly noticec
PLANNING COMMI'SS'ION RESOL1lTI'ON NO.' 51 4
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY AT 131'0 XHUPAROSA WAY, AT THE NORTHWESTERLY .CORNER 'OF CWUPAROSAKWAY AND 'LA'S FLORE'S 'DRIVE.. '.' ' ' . ' '
MHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 906C
Planning Commission did on .August'8, 1967, hold a duly noticec
61' publ'ic he'aring to consider the appl.i.cation of JACK H. HAGLER :
Ti
81 from 12 feet to 9 .feet in order to construct a patio roof on Y
variance for the' purpose. of a reducti'on in the rear yard setba
91 property in the City of Carlsbad, County of Sari Diego, State c
lo,/ California, commonly known as 1310 Chuparosa Way, at the. Nortk
I i
11 1x1 ly corner of Chuparosa Way and La's F1-ores' 'Drive,. and more par1
l211 as:
iI i
I x3
a4
2.5
k6
I' Portion of the Northwest one-quarter of the Southwest ont
: 11
[I
quarter of Section. 37, Township 11 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino .Base and Meridian, in the' City of Carlsbac
described in Exhibit "A" attached' hereto;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, ,upon hearing and conside
i County of San Diego, State of California;. more particulal
~ I
17/' the testimony and arguments, -if any, of all persons who desire
l8 I be heard, said Commission did find the. following facts and ret I l9
23"
the provisions and. general purpose .of Ordinance' No. 9060: '' exist whi'ch make the,granting of a variance necessary to carr)
1. That in order to ha've an adequate size patio this vat
22 is necessary.
23
24
25
an attractive additi-on.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the' Planning Comrnissiol
26 the City of Carlsbad that it does hereby, grant a variance on s '' property for the purpose of a reduction in the rear yard setbi
28 ' from 12 feet to 9 feet in order' to construct. a patio roof, on I
29
to the covered area'for the patio as shown on Exhibit IIB" att; 30
following conditions and limitations .tha't the variance applie:
2.' That rather than to deter -from the community, it wi7'
31
vertical walls. 32
hereto, ,and that the new structure shall not include any addil
I il
I 1
l
i !
a 0 r -
1. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting -of thc
2
1967,' 'by .the following vote,. to wi't: 3
Carls.b.ad City .Planning Commission held on the'. 8th .day -of Augu!
4 AYE,S: C'ommissi,oners .Smith, McComas, Palmateer, Little, l
5 and Voorheis: 6 .. N'O'ES : None.
7 I1 ABSENT:' Commissioner..Sutherland.
8 II
3-1 7 13
l6 I
l9 I
l4
15
I
3.7
18
ATTER/d& i ......... ,..
-7
I' TEER, Secretary
.. . . par&- .. . ... ..
R. i. LI.TTLE, Vice-chairman
?
20 1
231
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
!
il
" 2 -
0 *. 0
I
7 Frr ,! T q??f7PT"r7TP.3.: r3 I>*-:,, ".:i7?7 "._I A-.d! 7"" ^i.>Ji.l;iL i AI-".; LJ: -.,:i _,.LA i - "
Ti-:.25 ;:;sy;i(>z of 'Cr;e 1. ?TO-Vkk3c?+ .I i "lL,.i,,u* n?7",.>+2? uh'" .,," i.' rl. "kc, LLiU SclJ;I?-?-.st 2Qbi-%2T of thg So,.:C"l;:..: "I
m,,* "tL".i 7.: ~,~~ c7. cjf Se,:;:.ioyi jJ_, -_I Tu,.:T3?:j-.:> 3-1 S.>>;.t?i, 3z:zz & ;;Est, Sz; ~.er>~r"'i:>~ p5.e n 3:
2ec,:oTfi+?g .i;o +,32 ,Z;ffi+?- 21.,zb b>.J..eg, .3.23C;"l.Ged. 2s fD,lzp.,:s:
* ~.l~r-j~ien, In t:iz Zit;. <!I .~~.~~~>~<~a I Co:~?-i;y oz .Sgq U" 3ic~,-~ o Y *. State of Caiifo;-nia; ..
c fJ .& )j it ;*g% 4,
.. 63 $ s*o;;rp -=4c2 **
y;cp;; r' $3
$5; .,”: ; -ril 3 7”.*f 1 - % ’%;.;, $.