Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-09-14; Planning Commission; Resolution 720+. '3 .: -c* I I 1 I 1 = !I 2 3 4 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 720 A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLANNI-NG COMMISSIGN RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE DENIAL OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-1-7,500 TO C-2 (GENERAL COM- MERCIAL) ZONE AND DENIAL OF A SPECIFIC PLAN ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF INTERSTATE-5 i AND LAS FLORES DRIVE 5 11 .. 6 I1 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 90 7 i noticed public hearing to consider the application of HALL, G 8 the Planning Commission did on September 14, 1971 hold a duly 9,' NILSEN for a Change of Zone from R-1-7,500 to C-2 (General Co 10 1: i mercial) Zone and adoption of a specific plan on real propert 111 the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Californi' 12 commonly known as the southeast quadrant of Interstate-5 and 13 Las Flores Drive, more particularly described as: 14 ji I-5 i 16 17 , 18 I 19 I That portion of Lot 4 in Section 31, Township 11 South, Range 4 West, San Bernadino Base and Meridian in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California5 also being portions of Parcels 12, 43, 44, 50, Book 156, Page 012 of the Assessor's Map of San Diego County; and mlore particularly described in application on file in the City Planning Department WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon heari.ng and consi. 20 ~ 1. The proposed development is not in the best interest of t 25 visions and general purpose of Ordinance No. 9060; 24 1 and adoption of-a specific plan necessary to carry out the pr 23 to exist which make the denial of application for Change of 2 22 be heard, said Commission did find the follow-i.ng facts and re 21 the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons whQ desi.r 2% ~ health, welfare, and safety of the community at this time, .27'1 2. A commercial development in the subject area would detrac Z8 from the residential setting which now surrounds the area. 29 3. It appears that an increase in traffic generated by such 30 development would indanger the safety of the school children 31 who now walk to the Buena Vista School from west of the freev 32'' and contribute significantly to unnecessary noise and congesl I 1 I! on Las Flores, between Pi0 Pic0 and Interstate-5., I1 y.' ," -* /I 0 e 1 11 1 widening of Interstate-5 will have on the communtty, and 2 4. At this time it is hard to determine the impact that the 5. The staff at the present time cannot establish a need for 5 appropriate to insure the success of the proposed development 4 it is the feeling of the staff that the timing may not be 3 6 another service statim, Th.is is sh.wn by a study Nhich cQnp 7ij total capacity of the service stations of Carlsbad $gains,t wh lo; month is 40,300 gallons during summer months and 33,300 gallo of 87,500 per month. The average number of gallons pumped pt 9 they are actually pumping. The study shows an ayerage capabi, 11 per month during the fall, winter and spri.ng months. Th,fs st %I li I 11 il 12 indicates that the present stations are pumpi-ng 43% of thei,r 13 i 6. The Las Flores interchange along with Lqs Flores Dri.ye we 14 potential, and this does not indicate a, need for MQre station 1 not constructed to accomodate the projected traffic vQlumes I-5 NOM, THEREFORE, BE 1.T RESOLVED by the Planning Commissj,on 17 I 16 normally associated with freeway-oriented facilities. 18 11 the City Qf Carlsbad that it does hereby recommend denial of 19 application for change of tone to C-2 zone on subject propert 20 AND FINALLY ,RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution shall 21 forwarded to City Council for their handling as prescribed by 22 25 \! AYE,S: Commissioners Jose, Dewhurst, Hermsen, BQminguez, I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 23 September, 7971, by the following vote, to-wit; 241 \Carlsbad City Planning Commission ehld on the 14th day of Chairman Little 26 I/ .27 /I I/ NOES: None 1 I ABSENT: Commissioner Palmateer 28 11 29 ATTEST: 30 1 ~ I @&..r& L. ROBERT T. LITTLE, Chairman Ad N, Secretary 1