HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-06-27; Planning Commission; Resolution 797y, &,-" !i 11 ii
jl !I
e 0
!I !! 1 Ij il PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 797
2 j/ A RESOLUTION DENYING A CHANGE OF' ZONE FROM R-1-10,OOO
3!/
TO C-1 , R-3., and R-1-6,000 ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL AND ON THE SOUTHERLY 1, SIDE OF HIGHNAY 78 4 li
5 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Title 21 of the Carlsl
6
I duly noticed public hearing to consider the application of CHALLl 7
Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did on June 27, 1972, ho'
cribed as: 11
Real and on the southerly side of Highway 78, more particularly c 10
R-1-6,000 on real property located on the easterly side of El Can 9
BUILDERS, INC. for a Change of Zone from R-l-10,000 to C-1, R-3, 8
!
'62 Property known as Assessor's Parcel No. 24,
13
14
l5 I
Book 167, Page 4, City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California; and more
particularly described on file in the Carlsbad
le I
I!
City Planning Office.
3.7 1
11
IrJtlEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considerin:
181 testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be
19/lheard, said Commission did find the following facts and reasons t
*201i exist which make the denial of an application for Change of Zone
2E// necessary to carry out the provisions and general purpose of Ti.tl
22bof ;j the Carlsbad Municipal Code:
23 !I
241!struction li in this flood plain is likely to create substantial
25!l !! environmental damage through the resulting destruction of the
2e:iflood plain or will unavoidably i.njure fish, wildlife or their
11
;j
Ij
{I
i; .!i1. Pursuant to Section 11549.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, con-
/j
i!
ii
24Ij habitat.
28112. The proposed densities are in conflict with recommendations o
29h the General Plan.
3ol(3. Flood plain development is under review as a porti.on of the
311j i/ Planning Department General Plan Revision Study of physiographic
Sz\\resources and community design and preparation of conservation
!I ii
I/
ri
lelement of a comprehensive General Plan revision.
I( il
* .- -2,” c t/ I! 0 * 11 j!
I! il P il It
2 11
4 ii
3 /i
‘!
11
5
6
7
8
9
3.0
11
12
I*!
13 I
15
16
l7 !
l8 j j jl 19
.20 [I
21 lj
j/
I’ !I
fl
22 1; 4
23 ij !j
24 I/
28 jl i
2$)/ i
I1
li
4. Development in this area should be deferred pending complet
of the Army Corps of Engineers report on Buena Vi’sta Creek and
Floodplain. Preparation of this report is scheduled for someti
in the 72-73 fiscal year.
5. Comments have not yet been received from the Department of
Fish and Game as established by Section 1601 requirement of the
Fish and Game code for submittal for review of any project whic
would alter the natural course or bed of a stream or result in
destruction of fish, wildlife, or their habitat.
6. The provisions for access to this development are inadequat
7. The site does not appear to be physically suitable for this
type of development at the present time.
l\lOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission 0’
City of Carlsbad that it does hereby deny an amendment to Title
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, changing the zone from R-1-10,01
C-1, R-3 and R-1-6,000 on said property.
PASSED., APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Ca.
City Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1972, by
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Dewhurst, Little, Jose, Palmateey, Nor1
Forman
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Dominguez
/7”, ‘\ ’ ”
ATTEST:
31 j
32 // t!
jl
1, 1
\\