HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-06-26; Planning Commission; Resolution 924- 4
" I1 * 0 I/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO ,924
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO R.3 [MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL' ZONE, TO PERMIT THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 49 UNIT CONDOMINrUl PROJECT, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO CANNON ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 50 FT. EASTE~ OF THE INTERSECTION OF EL ARBOL DRIVE AND CANNON ROAD, APPLICANT: W. D. CANNON
REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ZONE [ZC-115) FROM R-1 (SINGLE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Califo
8
of San Diego, State of California, according to 16
Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, County 15
That portion of Lot "H" of the Rancho Agua 14
Drive and Cannon Road, and more particularly described as: l3
Cannon Road, approximately 50 ft. easterly of the intersection of El Arb 12
condominium project on property generally located southerly of and adjac 11
R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) zone, to allow the construction of a 4 10
sider a request for a change of zone from R-1 (Single Family Residential 9
did on the 26th day of June, 1973, hold a duly noticed public hearing to
17
WHEREAS, said application has complied with the requirements of 19
Map thereof No. 823, filed in the office of the
18 County Recorder of said county.
2o
determined to have a non-significant impact on the environment; and, 21
"City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972" and has be
22 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, and upon hearing and considerir
23
said Commission did find the following facts and reasons to exist which 24
the testimony and arguments , if any, of all persons who desired to be hc
purpose of Title 21 : 26
make the denial of a zone change necessary to carry out the provisions i 25
27
28
29
30
31
32
1. Non-conformance of the requested density to the dens. commitment as indicated by the adopted General Plan, whic 3-7 d.u./acre. Based upon the existing and potential USI the area , the General Plan commitment seems to be still t for the subject parcel.
2. The lack of compatability of the maximum possible del permitted in the R-3 Zone district and even the indicate( of 7.1 d.u./acre to the existing residential development area, and the semi-industrial activities to the north an( of the subject property.
il -1 -
de.->
.I e a
1
2
3
3. The existence of physical features, such as the drain basin and the A.T.S. & F. R.R., which require special sit' design techniques to make any development liveable. Staf believes that such techniques can not be applied at the permitted R-3 district density or even the proposed 7.1 d acre density.
4!
5/ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the P1 anning Commission of the
6
property from R-1 to R-3. 8
adoption of an amendment to Title 21 for a reclassification in zone on s '7
of Carl sbad, that it does hereby recommend denial to the City Council ,
9 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of
10
AYES: Commissioners Jose, Palmateer, Forman & Casler 12
following vote, to wit; 11
Carlsbad Planning Commission, held on the 26th day of June, 1973, by the
13
ABSENT: Commissioners Dominguez and Wrench 14
NOES: Commissioner Little
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 ATTEST:
22.
\
23
Secretary 24
QCP-q ' DONALD A. AGATEP,
25 // 26 11
21
28
29
30
31
32
-2- /I