HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-08-14; Planning Commission; Resolution 942m e a
3.
2
3
4
5
6
7
.RESOLUTION NO. 942
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF ZONE (C-2) GENERAL
COMMERCIAL FROM (R-1-7500) SINGLE FAMILY RESI- DENTIAL AND C-1 (NEIGHBORHOOD COM?(ERCIAL) ZONES TO ALLOW A COMMERCIAL/PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ELM AVENUE BETWEEN PI0 PIC0 DRIVE AND HIGHLAND DRIVE (ROBERT L. WATSON - COLONIAL MALL) I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbi I
8
and more particularly described as: 14
south side of Elm Avenue between Pi0 Pic0 Drive and Highlanc 13
Professional development on property generally located on t 12
mercial) to C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, to al'low a Commr 11
R-1-7500 (Single Family Residential) and C-1 (Nei,ghborhood C 10
public hearing to consider a request for a Change of Zone fr g
California, did on the 14th day of August, 1973, hold a dul)
15
16
17
18
19
That portion of Lots 17 to 24, inclusive, in Block 86 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to map there No. 535, filed in the Office of the County Recorde of San Diego County, May 2, 1888: TOGETHER NITM a portion of Tract 115 of the Town of Carlsbad, Cour
of San Diego, State d'f California, according to ma thereof No. 775, filed in the Office of the CountJ Recorder of San Diego County, February 15, 1894.
2o ! WHEREAS, said application has complied with the require
21
the City of Carlsbad, that it does hereby recommend DENIAL t 32
WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commissi 31
potential uses in the area. 30
1. Non-conformance with the existing General Plan and 29
ary to carry out the provisions and general purpose of Title 28
and reasons to exist which make the DENIAL of a Zone Change 27
desired to be heard, said Commission did find the following 26
sidering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons 25
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, and upon hearing and c 24
environment; and, 23
and has been determined to have a non-significant impact on 22
of the "Cfty of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance
r, It *
X
2
City Council, of the adoption of an amendment to Title 21 f
7
AYES: Commissioners Jose, Formans lsllrench and Palmateer 6
of August, 1973, by the following vote, to wit: ' of the City of Carlsbad Planning Commission, held on the 14t ' 3
reclassification in zone on said property.
NOES: Commissioners Casler, Little and Dorninguez
8
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
ABSENT: None
9) , .-.~.G
10
11
,.,.., C/i_,,IU ..,... ~~~,,,~~.~,,.~ .... ~,~...~~.,'~~~~" :is>& r:*"-%*Lr *%w*&.ss
'211 ATTEST:
13
14
15
16
17
18
3.9
2o /I 21
22
23 11
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
33.
32