HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-11-27; Planning Commission; Resolution 1016.CO
1
2
4 31
5
PLANNING COMMISSIOM RESOLUTI @ NO. 1016
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNENG COFIMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNTA, SETTPNG FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDTMG TO THE CITY C0UNCI.L
DWELOPTJIENT OF A COPTIERCrAL COMPLEX ON LAND GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTIOM OF MARRON ROAD AND EL CAMPNO REAL. APPLICANT: THE .RTMKER. COMPANY . . . . . . ,
DENIAL OF A SPECIFIC FLAW CSP”134j TO ALLObt
~ 6
property generally located at the southeast comer of tke tntergbction 9
Spect‘fic Plan (SP-134]- to allow the deyelopment of‘ a commercl’al complex on 8
a yerifted qpp17cqt7on from THE llI,NKER COMPANY requestbg approyal of a 7
WHEREAS., the Planning Commi‘ss?on of €he Cfty of Carlsbad did receive
10 of Marron Road and El Camino Real , more particularly described as: I
11
12
13
14
Portions of Lots 4 and 5 in Section 32, Township 11 South Range 4 West, San Bernardino Rase and Yeridian, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
~ WHEREAS, the Plannicg Cornmission did consider the Final Environmental
15
WHEREAS, the Planning Comml’ssion did hold a duly noticed public heari 16
Impact Report for this project (EIS#171) and did approve same, as presente
No. 9060: 21
Plan necessary to carry out the provisions and general purpose of Ordinancl 20
and reasons to exist which make the recommendatton for DENIAL of this Spec 19
persons who desi‘red to be heard, said Commission did find the following fa 18
and upon hearing and considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of a 17
22
23
24
25
26
1. The Specific Plan does not conform to the adopted General Plan.
2. The denial of the Chanae of Zone precludes consideration
of tfie Speciftc Plan. The study prepared by Lampman and Associates does indicate that a neighborfiood facl’lity may be appropriate for the area. The existl’ng terrain and c-iiculati’on .makes the subject property the least suitable for a neighborfiood comeriial facility.
27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
28
xx 31
xx 30
Specific Plan , for the reasons stated above. 29
Carl sbad that it does hereby recommend to the City Council the DENIAL of a
32
L " I 1
0 e
1 1 PASsED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Crty of Carl sbad Planning Commiss
2 at tkeir regular meetl'ng of November 27, 1973, by the following vote, to w
3
4
AYES: Commtsstoners Domimguez, Jose, Cas1 er, Forman, Palmateer, Littl
NOES: None Wrench
5 11 ABSENT: None
6
7
a
9
10
11
12 ATTEST:
13 '
14
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
li - 2-