Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-01-08; Planning Commission; Resolution 1031Id ii y a e ?l-!?!!{I?!'; C??"FJT~STCI!! ?,FSI)[.,JTI,?r%j r..(g. 1 ?-?I i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 .gl RESOLk.JTIQ!j QF THE I'Lfi:r.I!'.IIP!G CQ!!??IsSIP>l PF ?!.?E CITY OF CA!?LSB,?D, C9L.!FQ!?NIA, DEVYTFIG I! V?QJ.?T\!CF: P,En[JEsT, TO I!JCn!:.fl?E TYF f'"AKI?JF.? PER.!:?J.TTEI) E!!- "" wy,ctwyr IgTn I\ wy2:Iv.Fn YAR~ FW: 2 FT. ~n 6.5 FT., ry np.nq~n~\; CFYEP~.LLY LOC~,TE~ tqnR.n-p!,p/ OF A,NO P,DJ,!CEF!T T? !!":'"n",. r)?I\!E P.T THE !h!E?TE!?!-" MPS? EXTENS1gr.I OF ?!3.'!!:??.:!, R?TVF_. APPLICA,NT: STANI-C\' ??!YE'? - '1-334. ')!HE??E\S, pursuant to the qrovisions of Title 21 of the Car! shad Yunicipal Code, the Planninrl Commission did on December 1'1, 1073 and January 3, 1974, hold a duly not-iced ?uublic Ljearino to consider a renuest for a Variance to increase the lnaxiwr: permitted encroachment intn a required yard from 2 ft. to 5.5 ft. , on Vr0Dert.v qenera,lly 1 ocated northel of and adjacent to Flavarra ?rive at "se westerly most extension of Vavarra Drive, an.! more ?srticularl>/ described as: Lot 2 of Carlsbad Tract 77-33, in the Cit.v nf Carlsbad, County o? Fan Dieqo, State of Californi?, according to Yap thereof Yo. 7594, filed in t!?e I)frice of the County %corder of San Eieao C~untv on .&pril 4., 1973. 1 IprCrAc ., . !:, said annlication has complied with the requiregents of the '!(:-it\/ of Ca.rl shad Environmental Protection CIrdinance of 197?" and ha: been declared to have a Non-Siqni?icant im?act on the environyent. 'PFnFflS, at said nublic hearinq, upon hearinrl and considerim all testimony and arquments, the Cowission did find the following "acts and reasons to exist which make the 9EMTAL of said Variance necessar,y, to carry out the Frovision and seneral ?urDose of Title 71 os the Carlshad Municipal Code: 1. Said request does not meet the Variance criteria, and would be detrjrnental to the neishborina properties. 2. The requested Variance would encroach on the view of the ad.joinins nroperties. i 3. The hardshin involved in t$is request is personal , and does not relate to the propertv. P rt, :: <: .. c ... r] 3 fiPi??.!?~F~ AW RDnPTEr! at a regular nleetincl 0-F the Plannincr Comni.;.;i:?n of the City of Carl shad, held on the 8th day of: Januar,y, lCa74, by the fol lowina vote, to wft: 32 -* ** a i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 0 0 AYES: Commissioners 'drench, Casler, Forman, l!ose NOES- Commissioners Li%tle and Dominyez AB5EENT:Commissioner Palmateer ATTEST: -. -3- C/ T,Y OF CA-RLSSA B PLAPjNING DEPT APPLICA PI7 LIB. /SO/ REQUlREMENTS/ PC<?, 'GEPJ. PLAN CASE PJO Ai?EA &?D 2 f Ex/Sr/P\dG LA/;$D USE . DA 7-E plio'd 30, 19?3. EXHIBIT "A" u L._ u 4 . . . . . .. .. .. . Q -* ..