HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-01-08; Planning Commission; Resolution 1032.* ” * It ~.
.I b
& ., 0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1032
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNSNG COMMISSIQN OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND RE,C.OMMENDING’ TO THE CITY COUNCIL, APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZQNE FROM !I (INDUSTRIAL) AND C--M (HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO RD-M‘ (RESIDENTIAL DENSITY MUL- TIPLE), THUS ENSURING CONSISTENCY OF THE ZONING WITH THE LAND USE COMMITMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, FOR AREA NO. 2, KNOWN AS THE PONTO AREA.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 8th day
8
consider amending the Land Use portion of the General Plan 9
Jm”Y, 1974, hold a duly noticed public hearing to
10
Book 214, Page 16. 18
10, 71, 13, 19, 20, 21, 24-30, 34 and 35 of 17
San Diego County Assessor’s Parcel No. 4, 5, 6, 16
A Portion of Lot 4, Section 29, T12S, R4W, 15
particularly described as: 14
zoning for Area No. 2 known as the Ponto Area, and more 13
which requires consistency of Land Use recommendations and 12
residential to light industrial to comply with State Law, 11
to change the Land Use commitment from medium density
19 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did also hold a Public
20
C-M (Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial) to RD-M(Resident 21
Hearing to consider a change of Zone from M (Industrial) and
known as the Ponto Area, as shown on Exhibit “A‘‘ attached; a 23
Multiple) with 21 to 47 dwelling units per acre, for Area No 22
30
ing the testimony and arguments of all persons who desired 29
28
knviornment. 274
2nd has been declared to have a “Non-Significant” impact on 26
:ity of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 25
WHEREAS, either action has met the requirements of the 24
be heard, said commission did find the fo11oWing facts and
31 reasons to exist which require that the proposed Land Use
32 Ammendment not occur and that the proposed rezoning is
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission upon hearing and consi
b.7 %a
''I I/ e c)
1 necessary to carry out the provisions and general purpose o
2
4
1. Would be in conformance with the General Plan 3
Title 21
uses in the surrounding areas with regard to rezoning 6
2. Would bring this area into conformance with the 5
Commi tment.
7
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission 9
Bill 1301. 8
3. This rezoning would meet the intent of Assembly
10'
11
of the City of Carlsbad, that it does recommend to the City
Council that the proposed Land Use Ammendment not be approved 12
13
15
M and C-M to RD-M be approved for the above described area. 14
but that an ammendment to Title 21 for a change of Zone from
to wit: 18
held on the 8th day of January, 1974, by the following vote, 17
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, 16
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
19 AYES: Commissioners Dominguez, Forman, Jose, Caslet?, Wren
20 NOES: Commissioner Little
21
22
23
ABSENT: Commissioner Palmateer.
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32