Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-01-08; Planning Commission; Resolution 1032.* ” * It ~. .I b & ., 0 e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1032 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNSNG COMMISSIQN OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND RE,C.OMMENDING’ TO THE CITY COUNCIL, APPROVAL OF A CHANGE OF ZQNE FROM !I (INDUSTRIAL) AND C--M (HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO RD-M‘ (RESIDENTIAL DENSITY MUL- TIPLE), THUS ENSURING CONSISTENCY OF THE ZONING WITH THE LAND USE COMMITMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, FOR AREA NO. 2, KNOWN AS THE PONTO AREA. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 8th day 8 consider amending the Land Use portion of the General Plan 9 Jm”Y, 1974, hold a duly noticed public hearing to 10 Book 214, Page 16. 18 10, 71, 13, 19, 20, 21, 24-30, 34 and 35 of 17 San Diego County Assessor’s Parcel No. 4, 5, 6, 16 A Portion of Lot 4, Section 29, T12S, R4W, 15 particularly described as: 14 zoning for Area No. 2 known as the Ponto Area, and more 13 which requires consistency of Land Use recommendations and 12 residential to light industrial to comply with State Law, 11 to change the Land Use commitment from medium density 19 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did also hold a Public 20 C-M (Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial) to RD-M(Resident 21 Hearing to consider a change of Zone from M (Industrial) and known as the Ponto Area, as shown on Exhibit “A‘‘ attached; a 23 Multiple) with 21 to 47 dwelling units per acre, for Area No 22 30 ing the testimony and arguments of all persons who desired 29 28 knviornment. 274 2nd has been declared to have a “Non-Significant” impact on 26 :ity of Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972 25 WHEREAS, either action has met the requirements of the 24 be heard, said commission did find the fo11oWing facts and 31 reasons to exist which require that the proposed Land Use 32 Ammendment not occur and that the proposed rezoning is WHEREAS, the Planning Commission upon hearing and consi b.7 %a ''I I/ e c) 1 necessary to carry out the provisions and general purpose o 2 4 1. Would be in conformance with the General Plan 3 Title 21 uses in the surrounding areas with regard to rezoning 6 2. Would bring this area into conformance with the 5 Commi tment. 7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission 9 Bill 1301. 8 3. This rezoning would meet the intent of Assembly 10' 11 of the City of Carlsbad, that it does recommend to the City Council that the proposed Land Use Ammendment not be approved 12 13 15 M and C-M to RD-M be approved for the above described area. 14 but that an ammendment to Title 21 for a change of Zone from to wit: 18 held on the 8th day of January, 1974, by the following vote, 17 Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, 16 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 19 AYES: Commissioners Dominguez, Forman, Jose, Caslet?, Wren 20 NOES: Commissioner Little 21 22 23 ABSENT: Commissioner Palmateer. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32