HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-04-09; Planning Commission; Resolution 10561% . ll w e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO- 1056
1
2
3
#
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF LAND USE AMENDMENT NO. 11, AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN. CASE NO. GPA-25
5 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Carlst
6
of the City of Carlsbad General Plan, specifying that a desig- 9
follows: Adopting Land Use Amendment No, 41 (Land Use Element 8
scribed by law, to consider an amendment to the General Plan a 7
did on April 9, 1974, hold a duly noticed public hearing as pr
3.0
particularly described as: 13
of the intersection of Marron Road and El Camino Real and more 3.2
commercial on land generally located at the southeast corner 3.1
nation of low density residential be changed to neighborhood
14
15
16
Portions of Lots 4 and 5 in Section 32, Township 11 South Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
17 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon bearing and con-
18
Administration Commercial Land Use Designation: 22
hood commercial, but to instead, recommend a Professional 21
facts and reasons to exist to not recommend a change to neight 20
desired to be heard, said commission did find the following 19
sidering the testimony and arguments, -e’f any, of all persons c”
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
33.
32
33
a. It is in the public interest to establish a land use description on the subject property which would be compat- ible to the existing and proposed land uses in the same vicinity.
b. The existing land use designation is not reasonable ir terms of the existing terraing proximity of said property to the intersection of a major arterial and arterial stref and its proximity to a regional and neighborhood shopping center.
c. A neighborhood or community commercial designation is not considered appropriate for the subject property, since this commitment has been made for the area on an adjacent site. The inclusion of this property within the communitj commercial commitment would appear to be excessive and WOI tend toward strip commercial along El Camino Real.
d. The utilization of the subject property for a professi office allocation would be compatible and ancillary to commercial development to the north and west, and would PI
.A * w e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
3.2
13
14
15
16
for a smooth transition to the residential development to south and east.
e. Without a detailed market analysis, the neighborhood L appear to be adequately served in terms of neighborhood ar community commercial at ultimate development, by the faci- lities north of Marron Road, the proposed development at College and Elm Avenue extended (Farrow Property), the neighborhood center proposed at college and Rt. 78 (Ocean: and the existing development within the downtown area.
f. Said property could conceivably, through strong desigr be appropriate for a higher density residential land use commitment. However, such a development may not be as cor patible to existing and proposed development in the area i may not result in an environment that would be conducive . the potential residents' of such a development.
g. The property's location does not make it conducive to highway related commercial such as service stations, restaurants, and hotels.
h. The property's size, topography and location do not mi it appropriate for industrial development.
i. Finally, the preliminary indications of the on-going revision of the land use element of the General Plan, whic is the result of the-detailed analysis of the land use commitment of the total planning area, are that the subjec property has the highest use potential of a Professional Office.
17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLWED that said amendment
18
hereby recommended to be approved. l9
with a Professional Administrative Commercial designation is
20 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commissil
21
day of April, 1974, by the following vote, to wit: 22
of the City of Carlsbad at a regular meeting held on the 9th
23
24
25
2 6.
27
28
29
AYES: Commissioners Casler, Wrench, Jose, Little
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Barrett
ABSENT: Forman & Dominguez
, , .? 1 ~ .;./
p Ld- -"
MARY CAS'LER, Chairman
' d/ L,<&U.-/ /4 /(&
30
31
32 Secretary
DONALD A. &ATEP,
I I