HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-02-11; Planning Commission; Resolution 1134w 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 I
1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1134
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF THE REQUEST FOR A ZONE CHANGE
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
0. H. McCLELLAND
FROM C-2 TO R-P ON A -70 ACRE PIECE OF PROPERTY
BETWEEN CEDAR AND BEECH. CASE NO. ZC-157, APPLICANT:
~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property, to wit:
A1 1 that portion of Block 5 of Carl sbad in the City of Carl sbad, County of San Diego, according to amended Map No. 775 filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder on February 15, 1894 ,
has been filed with the City of Carl sbad and referred to the Planning Commis
and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by
Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was held at the time and in the place speci
in said notice on February 11 , 1975; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has complied with the Public Facility Policy of
City of Carlsbad and has provided the necessary information which insures Pt
Facilities will be available and current with need; and
WHEREAS, the subject application has complied with the requirements of
City of Carlsbad "Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972". The project
been declared to have a non-significant effect on the environment for the r(
that the property is in a developed area of the City and has no outstanding
natural characteristics.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering the test
and arguments, if any, of all persons who desired to be heard, said Commiss
considered all factors relating to the Conditional Use Permit and found the
following facts and reasons to exist:
1. The property is within the downtown special study area, which has recently been initiated. At this time, therefore, the City has h opportunity to determine future land use for the subject property Furthermore, the areaalong Carlsbad Boulevard north of Elm is in area of transition and not characterized by any particular land u group. This makes it difficult to determine at this time what th future land use patterns should be.
~
I
w e
1
2
3
4
5
61
2. The rezoning of this property would leave islands of commercial zot at either end of the block. The proper method of rezoning this cet property would be to rezone the entire block frontage or at least . subject property and the property to the north.
3. Denial without prejudice allows €he applicant to resubmit at a Iatc date when the City can give firmer direction on the future land us1 this area.
NOW, THEREFOREy BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City 0'
7 Carlsbad as follows:
8 A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
9
10
B) That a Zone Change is denied without prejudice on the request for Zone Change from C-2 to R-P on a .70 acre piece of property locate the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Cedar and Beech.
11 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of Carlsb
12
NOES : Commissioners Watson, Fikes 14
AYES : Commissioners Casler, Dorninguez, Jose, L'Heureux, Wrench 13
Planning Commission held on February 11, 1975 by the following vote, to wit:
15
16
17
18
19
ABSENT : None
ABSTAIN: None
20 ATTEST: I1
/
j
.*' ;
I i ,' ," . /$2i < ,' .. . ,, . A,,: .' ,..',,'//' J/ ,,7 /$*. J& . p,: i,''
I>\ .:.:, 2' pb2. " L/ 4" ""Jv "\ Gary.Wrench, Chairman
i
21 I/ 22
23
24
kd \ ATkbeg ,! '"$ Secretary ;;.,. ; ,y. .. ". .~
__" __ '. \
\ \
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 - 2-