HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-09-24; Planning Commission; Resolution 11931
2
3
4'
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1193
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAy SETTING FORTH ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO REZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO OPEN SPACE (0-S) , PUBLIC UTILITY (P-U), PLANNED INDUSTRIAL (P-M) AND RESIDENTIAL DENSITY -
CASE NO: ZC-168 MULTIPLE (RDM) ZONES.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 24th day of September, 1
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the
rezoning of certain properties to 0-S, P-U, P-M and RDM Zones to assure
General Plan/Zoning Ordinance consistency; and
WHEREAS, the subject Zone Change has complied with the requirements
of the City of Carlsbad "Environmental Protection Ordinance of 1972"; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, after the testimony and arguments,
of all persons who desired to be heard, said Commission considered all
the factors relating to the Zone Change and found the following facts and
reasons to exist:
A) This Zone Change is justified because it will implement the Goa and objectives of the Land Use Element and will provide the mandatory consistency between the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
B) This Zone Change is in the interest of furtherance of public welfare because the current zoning on the subject properties an corresponding permitted uses are not compatible with surroundin! zoning and uses.
C) The permitted uses in this proposed reclassification will not bl detrimental in any way to surrounding properties because it has been determined by prior studies and hearings on the Land Use Element that the land use categories as approved are the highes and best use of these properties and this zone change implement: the objectives of the Land Use Plan.
WHEREAS, due to the nature of this reclassification, it has been det
mined that a Declaration of Negative (non-significant) Environmental effe
is warranted for the following reasons:
1) Rezoning of these parcels is mandatory under the provisions of Section 65860 of the Government Code which requires General Plal Zoni ng Ordi nance consistency .
2) Application of various proposed zones will not necessarily chap or affect present or proposed land uses in the vicinity of the subject properties or the subject properties.
I/ e ll
1
2
3) Additional Environmental Assessments will be necessary at the time
WHEREAS, the properties considered under this Zone Change are described
proposed development of these properties.
3 11 by San Diego County Assessor's Book, Page and Parcel number as follows:
4 11
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
PARCEL FROM ZONE: TO ZONE: EXH I B
209-04-04( P) M & M(F-P) PM & P-M(F-P) 1 -05 M P-M 1 -09 M P-M 1 -1 2 M P-M 1 -14 M P-M 1
-16(P) M P-M 1 -21 M P-M 1 -22 M P-M 1
209-05-1 7 R-1-10,000 P-u 21 0-01 -24(P) P-U (F-P 0- (F-P ) 21 0-09-1 6 . R-A P -M 1 21 0-1 0-08 M P-M !
-09 M P-M ! 21 1-03-01 M RD-M I - 02 M RD-M I -06 R-1-10,000 P-u I - 08 R-1-70,000 P-u I -25 M P -M ( -26 M P-M I -27 M P-M I - 28 M P-M 211-04-12(P) M P-M
21 1-05-08 R-A-10 , 000 P-u 21 4-01 008 R-1-10,000 P-M 21 5-41 -1 3 RD-M 0-s 223-1 2-33 R-7-7500 0-s -35 R- 1 -7 500 0-s 223-1 5-50 R-1-7500 0-s 223-1 6-24 R-1-7500 0-s
r
1
and are shown on maps marked as Exhibit 1 through 13 inclusive, dated
22
xxxxxxx 32
xxxxxxxx 31
xxxxxxx 30
Commission on September 24, 1975, by the following vote, to wit: 29
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning 28
recommended for approval . 27
B) That this zone change to apply an F-P Overlay Zone to the underlyi 26
A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 25
of Carlsbad as follows: 24
. .. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the P1 anning Commission of the City 23
September 24, 1975, on file in the Planning Department of the City of Carlsb
zones of the various properties described in this application is
I/ -2- I1
,, 0 *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
AYES : Commissioners Watson, Dominguez, Packard, Jose, Fikes
Larson, L ' Heureux
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN : None
ATTEST:
I
I -3-