HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-05-26; Planning Commission; Resolution 1258v. .- .
1
2
3
4
5
6
c m
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1258
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION 21.10.080 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW CREATION OF A
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF PINE AVENUE BETWEEN McKINLEY AND EUREKA.
APPLICANT: CYNTHIA McPHERSON
SUBSTANDARD-WIDTH LOT ON PROPERTY LOCATED
CASE NO. : V-263
7 /I
8
9 wit:
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property, t
10
11
12
That portion of Lot 10 of Subdivision of Tracts 114 and 120 of Carlsbad Lands, County of San Diego, Sate of California, according to the map thereof No. 1744, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, January 3, 1923
l3
Planning Commission; and l4
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the
as provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code"; and l6
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request 15
17 ;I WHEREAS, the public hearing was held at the time and in
l8 the place specified in said notice on May 26, 1976; and
19
20
21 sired to be heard, said Commission considered all factors re-
22 lating to the Variance and found the following facts and reaso
23 to exist:
24 1) There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
25 or conditions applicable to the property or to the intendl
26 use in the same vicinity and zone because:
27 a) There are many similar sized lots in the general are'
28 b) The topography is relatively flat.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and conside
ing the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who de
use that apply generally to the other property or class o
z -i -. *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
0 m
2) Such variance is not necessary for the preservation and and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity because:
a) All property in the same vicinity is similarly
3) The granting of such variance will adversely affect the
devel oped.
comprehensive General Plan because:
a) Subdividing the property will limit the possibility for higher density on the property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That a Variance is denied to allow creation of a substand width lot on property located on the north side of Pine A between McKinley and Eureka.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on May 26, 1976 by the fa
ing vote, to wit:
AYES: Comrni ssioners Jose, Fi kes , Ne1 son , L 'Heureux, Larson, Dominguez and Watson.
NOES : None
Stephen'". L'Heukeux,(Chairman
ATTEST:
@PL k
Dondld A. Agatep, Secu'etary
~
11 -2-