HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-02-23; Planning Commission; Resolution 1331> .t ,%' r. il 1) I)
1 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1331
2
3
4
5
6
7
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ALLOW RETENTION OF AN ADDITIONAL FREESTANDING SIGN AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 21.41.075(b) OF THE CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON PASEO DEL NORTE ON THE EAST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 5 BETWEEN CANNON ROAD AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. CASE NO.: CUP-1 33 APPLICANT: FEIST, VETTER, KNAUF AND LOY
II
8 I1 WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property,
911 wit:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o I
That portion of Lot 10 of Rancho Agua Hedionda in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 7492, filed in the Office of the Recorder of said San Diego County, and also listed in Assessor's Book No. 211, Page 060, Parcel 07
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a reques'
provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code;" and
WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the subject
Conditional Use Permit was held at the time and in the place
specified in the public notice on February 23, 1977; and
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consi
the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desi
to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relatin5
the requested Conditional Use Permit and found the followin!
and reasons to exist:
1) The subject application has complied with the requireme of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Act of 1972 be
a) The subject request is categorically exempt from th Environmental Protection Ordinance, Section 19.04.0
.- 5 q 0
1 2)
2
3
4
5
6
3)
79 4)
8
9
10
II
12
13
14
15
16 6)
17
18
5)
19 I 7)
20
21
22
23
24
25
8)
27
26
28
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the General Plan because:
a) The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates
the subject site as RRE (Extensive Regional Retail),
which permits such sign usage.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent with
applicable City Public Facilities and Ordinances because:
a) All public facilities are existing for the site.
The proposed sign is appropriate for the property because
a) The requested sign will be separated sufficiently fro
the only other freestanding sign on the property (300
The proposed sign is compatible with the adjacent propert because :
a) Similar signs have been approved for existing and pla
dealerships along Paseo del Norte (CUP-129).
b) Two or more signs per property were approved for exis or planned dealerships under CUP-129.
c) The design and dimensions of the requested sign are similar to those configurations approved for signs under previous approvals (CUP-129).
The proposed sign will not interfere with the safety of .
traveling public because:
a) The sign is adequately separated from the visual cor:
to insure proper sight distance.
The proposed sign will not result in proliferation of si1 in the area because:
a) Other dealerships in the area have been allowed at 1 two freestanding signs of the type requested.
b) Other dealerships in the area could apply for a CUP allow more than one freestanding sign under Section 21.41.075.
The proposed sign will not adversely affect the appearar
of the area and will not unduly restrict views because:
a) The requested sign is similar in size and design to other approved signs in the area.
b) The sign is compatible in copy with other existing E planned/approved signs in the area
C) No significant features exist near the Sign that WOI
-2- be blocked from view by the structure.
”. ,{ w 0
I 1
2
3
4
5
6
9) The requested use is necessary or desirable for the develc ment of the community, and is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specif, cally permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is be located because:
a) The sign is necessary to identify a type of subuse on the property not adequately identified by the existin perrn’i tted freestanding sign.
7 b) The additional sign will not detract from the overall visual appearance of the Auto Center.
8
9
10) The site for the intended use is adequate to accommodate use because:
10
I1
a) The width of the site (1,0892 feet is great enough to absorb an additional freestanding sign in addition to the existing sign without creating an undesirable clutter of signing.
I-2
13
11) All yards, setbacks and other features necessary to adju the requested use to existing or permitted future uses i the neighborhood will be provided and maintai.ned because
14
15
a) The sign is existing and meets requirements of the zoning ordinance and building code.
16 properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed us
17 because:
18 a) Paseo del Norte, Cannon Road and Palomar Airport ROE are all designed to handle the volume of traffic ger
19 ated by the Automobile Center, of which the additior sign is a part.
2o I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commissil
12) The street system serving the proposed use is adequate
211i of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
22
B) That in view of the findings heretofore made and conside 23
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
to the following conditions: 25
is to approve the Conditional Use Permit (CUP-133), subj the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commiss 24
26
27
28 XXXXXXXXXX -3-
1) The approval is granted for the land described in the ap tion and attachments thereto, as shown on Exhibit A, dat January 13, 1977, and Exhibit B, dated January 13, 1977.
(. . Cy
'1 ,
v (I)
L 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
2) The location of the sign shall conform to all requirement! Section 21.41.075 (b,l-8). The Planning Director shall determine conformity with the referenced section prior to approval of a sign permit.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on February 23, 197'
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Larson, Rombotis, Nelson, L'Heurl and Jose.
NOES : None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners Fi kes and Watson.
[id- IC LARS N, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
l7 i J 6!2LJL 18 1 RA% PLENDER, SECRETARY
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 4-