HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-03-09; Planning Commission; Resolution 1339< .., I
v II W 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1339
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAy RECOMMENDING
CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON A LOT APPROXIMATELY 13,000 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF MAPLE AVENUE AND CARLSBAD BOULEVARD. CASE NO.: CT 77-4 APPLICANT: S & L ENTERPRISES
APPROVAL OF A ONE-LOT, SIX-DWELLING UNIT
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain property,
wit:
Lots 5 and 6, Block C, of Palisades Subdivision, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the map thereof No. 1747, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February 5, 1923, and also listed in the County Assessor's Book No. 204, Page 141, Parcels 9 and 10
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provi
by the "Carlsbad Municipal Code;" and
WHEREAS, the public hearing to consider the subject requ
was held on March 9, 1977, at the time and in the place speci
in the public hearing notice, pursuant to the provisions of t
Carl sbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consic
the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desir
to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating
to the Tentative Tract Map request (CT 77-4) and found the
following facts and reasons to exist:
1) The subject application has complied with the requiremenl of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Act of 1972 becz
a) An Environmental Impact Assessment of the project h; been conducted and a Negative Declaration made for 1
e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6 2)
7
8
9 3)
10
11
12
13 4)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
5)
6)
28 7)
fol.lowing reasons:
1) The project is within an urbanized area in which the natural landforms and vegetation have been inalterably modified.
2) The project will not significantly increase air pollution, water runoff, traffic or noise in the area.
The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan beca
a) The Land Use Element designates the site for resident land use at 20-30 dwelling units per acre. This proj
provides about 20 dwelling units per acre.
The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan because:
a) The project will provide orderly residential developm
b) The project will not cause excessive expansion of public facilities and/or expense to the taxpayer.
The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with appli City Public Facilities Policies and Ordinances because:
a) At this time, all necessary public facilities, includ sewer service, are available to serve the subject pro as proposed- However, sewer facilities may not be av ble when applications are made for building permit-s.., sewer facilities are not available at the time of bul pe.rmit application, building permits will not be issu until arrangements satisfactory to the City Council c be made to guarantee that all necessary sewer facilit will be available prior to occupancy.
The site is physically suitable for the type of developme because:
a) The site is an existing lot.
b) All significant public improvements are existing incl street improvements.
The site is physically suitable for the proposed density development because:
a) DweTling units to be provided per acre are consistent with General Plan density; and
b) All prebuilding site preparation has been accomplishe previously.
The design of the subdivision or the imposed improvements
-2-
I/ 0 *
1
2
not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or SI stantially and unavoidably injure the fish or wildlife or their habitat because:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
8)
a) A Negative Declaration has been made for the project 1 the following reasons:
1) The project is within an urbanized area in which thenatural landforms and vegetation have been inalterably modified.
2) The project will not significantly increase air pollution, water runoff, traffic or noise in the area o
The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements not confli'ct with easements required by the public at larc for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision because:
11 a) NO such easements are required.
12
B) That in view of the findings heretofore made and consideri 18
A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 17
the City of Carlsbad as follows: 16
NOW, THEREFORE,: BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission 15
a) Public access to the beach already exists. 14
shore1 ines because: 13
9) The subdivision will not prohibit reasonable access to pub
the applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commissio
waterways, rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, coastlines
19 is to approve CT 77-4, subject to the following conditions I 20
21
22
23
11 The approval is granted for the land described in the application and any attachments thereto ana as shown o the plot plan submitted labeled Exhibit A, dated Janua 1977.
2) Park-in-lieu fees shall be paid to the satisfaction of
Parks and Recreation Director prior to final map appro
24 I 3) A landscape and irrigation plan shall be approved by t Parks and Recreation Director prior to the issuance of 25 building permits and all landscaping and irrigation wi be installed prior to final occupancy. 26
27 Boulevard.
28 XXXXXXXXXX
4j- No' vehicular access shall be permitted along Carlsbad
II - -5-
*
4 I1 e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on March 9, 1977, b:
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Larson, Nelson, Jose, Watson, L'Heureux.
NOES: Commissioner Rombotis.
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Fikes.
ABSENT: None.
g$L 9- C LARSON, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
\ RALP S. PLENDER, SECRETARY
-4-