HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-05-11; Planning Commission; Resolution 13610 *
1
CASE NO. : CUP-136 5
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MC DONALD'S FAST-FOOD 3
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1361
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A REQUEST FOR A
RESTAURANT, SUBJECT TO SPECIFIC PLAN APPROVAL, ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL CAMINO REAL
BETWEEN MARRON ROAD AND HAYMAR DRIVE.
APPLICANT: SANTA ANITA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
WHEREAS, a verified application for a certain propert
to wit:
Those portions of Lots 4 and 5 of fractional section 32, Township 11 South, Range 4 West,
San Bernardino meridian, according to official
plat thereof, being in the City of Carlsbad, in
the County of San Diego, State of California, as
and 44
12 recorded in Assessor's Book No. 167, Parcels 25
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to. the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, this application constitutes a request as
provided by Title 21 of the "Carlsbad Municipal Code;" and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at th,
time and in the place specified in said notice on April 27,
2o!
1977; and
21 1 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
considering the testimony and arguments, if any, of all perso:
who desired to be heard, said Commission considered all facto.
relating to the Cond2tional.Use Permit request and found the
following facts and reasons to exist:
1) The requested use is not necessary or desirable for the
development of the community, is not in harmony with the
various elements and objectives of the General Plan.and i:
detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically perm: in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located bec
-k // e 0
I/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2)
3)
a) The increased traffic and parking congestion generated by this request would conflict with the Circulation Element guideline of coordinating "the distribution,
character and intensity of all land uses with the Land
Use Element to preclude the increased levels of
traffic which would be generated beyond the capacity
of the existing or planned street system until such time as adequate facilities can be provided."
b) The increased traffic and parking congestion generated by the request would conflict with the Land Use Elemen
Utility and Public Service Development guideline
of ensuring "the capacity of major street linkage to
provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system. ...
The site for the intended use is not adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, because:
a) The location of the site in relation to the adjacent service station, Center main entrance and parking lot traffic lane creates negative traffic impacts that cannot be mitigated.
b) The shape of the site, incorporating the proposeb
design, creates numerous traffic conflict points that
cannot be mitigated.
c) The size of the site, incorporating the size of the
proposed restaurant, dictates 'parking and circulation
design that will negatively impact the existing
circulation facilities and the visual character.of thc area.
All of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood are not provided because:
a) The landscape strip adjacent to the main entrance to the Center is not adequate, as designed, to provide a visual buffer for the proposed parking lot.
b) The design, as proposed, encroaches into an exist parking lot traffic lane.
4) The street system serving the proposed use is not adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by
the proposed use because:
a) Traffic generated by the proposed use will compot
the traffic congestion now experienced on El Camj
Real; and
11 -2-
- c 4. I m e
1
2
3
4
b) The traffic generated by the proposed uses when
combined with traffic generated by the expansion of the Plaza Camino Real Center, the remainder of the Carlsbad Plaza Center and the Center to be
constructed on the south side of Marron Road, will
create excessive congestion on El Camino Real in
the area.
5 '
A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 7
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
B) That the action of the Planning Commission is to DENY 8
9
10
11
12 City of Carlsbad Planning Commission held on May 11, 1977,
13
14
15
16
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commissio:
Conditional Use Permit request No. CUP-136, on property
located on the East side of El Camino Real between
Marron Road and Haymar Drive.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Commissioner Woodward, Larson, L'Heureux, JI
NOES : None.
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Rombotis, Watson.
17
18 19
< ABSENT : None.
ERIC LARSON, Chairman
I
26
27
28
-3-