Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-02-14; Planning Commission; Resolution 1491Ii w w c. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I 26 1~ I, 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1491 =SOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CALRSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT TO CONSTRUCT THE THIRD PHASE OF A NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER. CASE NO. : SDP 77-1 (B) APPLICANT: Mola Development WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Cod the Planning Commission on the 24th day of January, 1979, considered said application on property described as: Situated in the State of California, County of San Diego, Parcels 1, 2 and 3: All that portion of the west half of the northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 12 south, Range 4 west, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof, and also listed in the County Assessor's Book No. 215, Page 25, Parcel 49-55-511. WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, acting as Lead Agency, ha determined that the SDP 77-1(B) will not have a significant impact on the environment and has filed a Negative Declaratic for this project and that the project is in full complaince with the City of Carlsbad's Environmental Protection Ordinanc 1972, and the State EIR Guidelines; and WHEREAS, at said Planning Commission meeting a staff reg ~ was submitted and reviewed. At the conclusion of said hearir after consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission found the following facts and reasons to exist: // -1- II j/ w a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. The proposed development is compatible with the approvec Site Development Plan, SDP 77-1, because: a) The proposed use is consistent with the commercial of the development, and is approximately the same : footage anticipated when SDP 77-1 was approved. b) The building elevations demonstrate architectural patibility. c) The conditions of approval for this amendment will compatibility with the approved site plan. 2. The development will occur towards environmental factors An EIR for the entire project was certified on May 6, 19 Adequate mitigation has been provided. 3. The street system servicing the project is adequate to handle the traffic generated by the proposed project bec all necessary public improvements are required as a con6 of approval for SDP 77-1. 4. The project is consistent with the general plan because general plan provides for a neighborhood commercial dew ment on this site and the proposed prjoject meets the cri for a neighborhood shopping center. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the following vote, APPROVED SDP 77-1(B), subject to certain conditions: AYES: L'Heureux, Rombotis, Marcus, Jose, Wrench, Schick, Larson NOES : None 1. Approval is granted for the portion of the property desc in this application and shown on Exhibit "A", dated 1/24 2. The drive-thru provisions for the bank shall be for one only and shall be wide enough to accomodate an "escape lane". Final design of the drive thru window lane shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. This approval shall expire in one year from the date of approval unless building permits are issued and kept act The conditions listed above are to be in addition to all of t conditions of approval for SDP 77-1 as stated in Planning , Commission Resolution No. 1442. 1 // I -2- 1 w W NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the above 2 11 recitations are true and correct. 3 4 5 6 7 ATTEST: ! c-’ ’,\ i p.i +&“ .. i , \ , \ ,. :, /“ d STEPHEN M. L’ BEumUxf, Chai ”&.,-.. y;;; i. ~~.--“.;-“I~.I.-.,,”c v , CARLSBAD PLANNING C~MMISSI 8 9 /$” ,+ ..$ 0 ./ (d ,”f ,/ s <~~~~~T~<~r~ 10 ./>~RLSBAD PIANN~G COMMISSION I,. p 4 ’ I&.’‘ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 w w STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD 1 ss 1 I, JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly introduced, approved and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad at a regular meeting of said Commission held on the 14th day of February,,l97 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Schick, Rombotis, Wrench, Marcus, Jose, Lars NOES : None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: L'Heureux /"7 /f F[ .i"..: I! l& /&..."d /,' 1 /&All Phg~6 COMMISSI 1 ,,". ./ S -*6: 'BAG W' Secretar ., ,/ J j. 1'