The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1979-05-09; Planning Commission; Resolution 1514./ a .- _. 11 w v I/ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1514 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE ENCINA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY (FROM 13.75 TO 18 MGD) AND UPGRADING TO SECONDARY TREATMENT, IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL AND STATE, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF 1-5 BETWEEN POINTSETTIA LANE AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. CASE NO. : PDP-1 APPLICANT: LES EVANS, ENCINA JOINT POWERS WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a reques. as provided by Title 21of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Cot the Planning Commission did on the 25th day of April, 1979, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a request by applicants for a Precise Plan to allow the expansion of the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility from 13.75 mgd to 18 and to upgrade to secondary treatment, in order to comply wi Federal and State Laws, on property more specifically descri as: That portion of Lot 1, Fraction Section 20, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, S.B.M., in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to U.S. Government Survey approved October 25, 1875; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did consider the envir mental effects of said request as indicated in an environmen impact report (dated February 1975) that had been certified the Vista Sanitation District by Resolution No. 75-19; and // I . , r,, .I 11 w 1 I/ WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consid 2 3 the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desir 1. The Precise Development Plan ensures the compatibility c 6 found the following facts and reasons to exist: 5 relating to the proposed Precise Development Plan (PDP-l), an 4 to be heard, the Planning Commission considered all factors the project with the City's General Plan for the followj 7 reasons: 8 a. The General Plan Land Use Element designates the SL property for a public utility use. 9 b. The project is consistent with the goal and policy 10 the public facilities element of the General Plan. 11 2. The proposed Precise Development Plan ensures the compal of the development with surrounding development for the 12 following reasons: 13 14 15 16 a. Conditions are imposed as part of this approval thi mitigate most significant impacts resulting from tl project . b. The development is located in a depressed area tha. can easily be buffered in order to prevent adverse impacts to adjacent properties. 17 Ordinance since: 18 3. The proposed project conforms to the California Environl Quality Act, and the Carlsbad Environmental Protection 19 a. An EIR has been prepared and certified by the lead I agency. 20 21 22 b. Although it was found that the project may have si ificant adverse environmental impacts, said lead a has found overriding considerations justifying app of the project. 23 24 c. Adequate measures to mitigate significant impacts -2- 28 27 e. Other environmental agencies have conditionally ax 26 this EIR in approving the project. 25 included as part of the required approvals. d. The City, acting as responsible agency, has consid proved the project. // I1 .. I , '~. I1 W w 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I 4. The proposed Precise Development Plan provides for necessary public improvements as necessitated by the de\ ment since conditions are imposed which require such improvements. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the following vote, recommended approval of Precise Development Plan (PDP-1) wit1 certain conditions: 1. Development of the site shall occur as shown on PDF-1 E> A and B, dated 4/11/79, and Exhibit D, dated 4/9/79; ex( for modifications that are contained herein, and minor modifications approved by the Public Works Administratol 2. In addition to the approval of the development indicate( in the Exhibits noted in Condition No. 1, all other requirements listed in this approval shall be indicated the final Precise Development Plan. 3. Grading plans shall be approved by the Public Works Adm: trator or his designee, prior to this issuance of a bui: permit. Said plans shall include provisions to limit grading to the minimum area necessary for construction ( the facilities. 4. Surfaces shall be graded to direct runoff toward design( drainage facilities and away from cut and fill slopes. 5. Land shall not be cleared of vegetation except immediatt before grading, and all slopes shall be established for erosion control immediately upon completion of such grac Netive vegetation shall be retained wherever feasible. 6. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for tl entire facility and subject to the approval of the Plan] Director. The landscaping shall be designed to screen facilities from views along 1-5, and surrounding proper. Plans shall include fast growing tall trees, as well as combination of shrubs and ground cover. Plants shall bl drought tolerant to the maximum extent feasible, and fi: retardent whre necessary. Said landscape and irrigatiol shall be installed immediately upon completion of const: except that all screening landscaping shall be installec upon completion of grading, prior to any construction. 7. A noise study shall be performed by a qualified noise expert in order to establish acceptable noise levels at the property line of the treatment facility. Based on study and subject to the approval of the City Engineer, noise producing mechanisms and facilities shall be shie and buffered in such a manner so as to reduce noise lev( to the acceptable level. -3- c - .> , -. I,. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14 15 16 17 18 19 I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 14. 15. 16. 17. // 0 'W All influent wastewater shall be pre-treated in order tc remove odors. In addition, the screening structures, g~ removal tanks, primary sedimentation tanks, and all oper channels, including primary effluent channels, shall be covered and ventilated in order to remove odors. Odor removal towers are required and shall be delineatec on the final Precise Development Plan, subject to the approval of the Public Works Administrator. Fire hydrants shall be placed on the site as required a1 approved by the Fire Marshall. All necessary public improvements shall be installed SUI to the approval of the City Engineer. Said improvement; shall include the extension of the existing 10" water 1 along Avenida Encinas, from the northerly boundary of t: treatment facility to its southerly boundary. All storm drain and channel designs shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The placement of equipment on any roof tops shall be sc from views along 1-5 and from adjacent properties and s' to the approval of the Planning Director. All lighting shall be designed in a manner that will no adversely affect nearby residences or public roadways. A lighting plan shall be subject to the approval fo the Planning Director. Upon approval, the applicant shall submit a reproducibl copy of the Precise Development Plan which incorporates requirements of the approval to the City Manager for signature. Prior to signing the final Precise Developm Plan, the City Manager shall determine that all applica requirements have been incorporated into the plan and t all conditions of approval have been satisfactorily met otherwise guaranteed. The final signed Precise Develop Plan shall be the official site layout plan for the property and shall be attached to any application for a building permit on the subject property. Special provisions to control dust which is generated b grading activities shall be approved by the City Engine prior to commencement of grading. A "sludge disposal alternative" study shall be prepared by a qualified person, and subject to the approval of t Public Works Administrator or his designee. The most feasible sludge disposal alternative which would reduce the greatest number of negative impacts shall be incorg into the subject project. -4- ?. . ,.) ,I. " w W 1 AYES : L'Heureux, Schick, Marcus, Jose, Larson 2 3 4 NOES : None ABSTAIN: Rombotis ABSENT: Wrench 5 WHEREAS, the permit for this Precise Development Plan SI 6 or more times by the Planning Commission for an additional PC g after the adoption of this resolution unless it is extended c 8 has expired; or (2) if the permit is not used within one yea] 7 become null and void: (1) when any time specified in the pern 10 of time; however, no request for an extension of time shall 1 11 granted if the request is made after the expiration date of 1 12 original permit or term for performance of the condition or 13 extension thereof. 14 Carlsbad does hereby recommend approval of PDP-1 as submittec 15 NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of reference made a part hereof. 18 with Exhibits on file in the Planning Department Office, and 17 the applicant for the development of said property, in accorc 16 19 I 20 21 /I STEPHE@". L'HeUREyX, Chairman ~ ATTEST: 22 /I 28 -5- 1 , . , . .~. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 w w STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD 1 ss I, JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly introduced, approved and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad at a regular meeting of said Commission held on the 9th day of May, 1979, by the following roll call vote: AYES: L'Heureux, Schick, Marcus, Larson NOES : None ABSTAIN: Rombotis ABSENT : Jose, Wrench PDP-1 -6-