Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-06-13; Planning Commission; Resolution 1523a' *:? I1 @ e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3.0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ' 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1523 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR THE CONVERSION OF AN 80 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO CONDOMINIUMS. CASE NO. : CT 79-3/CP-3 APPLICANT: Peter Von Elten WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to That portion of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to official plat thereof recorded in the office of the County Recorder on December 30, 1977, has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 23rd day of 1979, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law consider said request; and WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has determined CT 79-3/CP- to be exempt from environmental review in accordance with Sec 19.04.090 (a) (8) of the Carlsbad Environmental Protection Ordinance which exempts the division of existing multiple fam rental units into condominiums; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consid the testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons who desir to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating // // . r l- I) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ~ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the tentative subdivision map (CT 79-3) and Condominium Permi (CP-3) and found the following facts and reasons to exist: 1. CT 79-3/CP-3 do not meet the design criteria as required Section 21.47.110 of the condominium ordinance. a) The plan is not comprehensive; the required ameniti were added with great difficulty to meet only the minimu requirements. b) The buildings are not well integrated to parking an' recreation areas. c) This development would not be compatible with exist and future circulation. The traffic on El Camino Real will increase, which will make this complex less desirab as ownership units. d) The internal street system is a dominant feature in development since it surrounds the development and proje into the interior. e) Common recreation areas are not centrally located a are not readily accessible to several of the units. f) Building placement does not create private areas no reduce noise from El Camino Real. 2. This project does not meet the parking requirements of Section 21.47.130 (2) . a) 183 spaces are required; only 168 have been provide b) The spaces are not readily accessible to the units are supposed to serve. c) The northern parcel parking area is acceptable for and trailer storage but not for required parking, f it is not accessible to the units. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the following vote, denied CT 79-3/CP-3 for the reasons as stated above. AYES : L'Heureux, Wrench, Marcus, Jose, Larson NOES : Schick ABSENT: Rombotis ABSTAIN: None // -2- ., .. . 1 0 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the foregoing 2 recitations are true and correct. /I 3 4 5 r \. ,- ;-. p ; , .: \ {. ~ . .., b > I. <s~+ydL - . . ,,.a; .-.“.-.<E‘, I, STEPHEKM. L’KEUREUZ, Chail CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSI( 6 ATTEST: I1 =I II 12 -3- 13 CT 79-3/CP-3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ~ I 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 .' .. < r' a 0 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 CITY OF CARLSBAD 1 ss COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) 3 4 5 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, do 6 hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly 7 introduced, approved and adopted by the Planning 8 Commission of the City of Carlsbad at a regular meeting g of said Commission held on the 13th day of June, 1979 I, JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning 10 by the following roll call vote: 11 ABSTAIN: Rombotis 13 NOES : None 12 AYES: L'Heureux, Schick, Wrench, Marcus, Jose, Larson 14 15 16 1'7 18 19 20 I ABSENT: None G COMMISSION i .I I/' -4- 21 22 CT 79-3/CP-3 23 24 25 11 26 27 28 II