Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-10-24; Planning Commission; Resolution 1551t: >I1 a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I! 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1551 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSON OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR ELEVEN CONDOMINIUM UNITS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SANTA ISABEL STREET BETWEEN ALGA ROAD AND EL FUERTE STMET. CASE NO. : CT 79-8/CP-ll APPLICANT: Walton, Dave WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, t Lot 409 of La Costa Meadows unit No. 2, according to Map thereof No. 6905 filed with the County Recorder April 21, 1971; has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a reques provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, this project has been processed through enviro review, Log No. 571, and a Negative Declaration has been iss based on the following justification: 1. The subject property has been previously graded and is devoid of any significant flora or fauna, or any histor l or unique environmental resources. ~ 2. The City's condominium and grading ordinances will adequately serve to mitigate any potential adverse impac which would be generated by the project. ~ 3. The proposed condominium development is consistent with City's land use plan, and with the trend in development the La Costa area. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on October 10, 19' hold a duly noticed, public hearing as prescribed by law, to consider said request; and // 28 // - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consi all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating the Carlsbad Tract (CT 79-8) and Condominium Permit (CP-11) and found the following facts and reasons to exist: Findings 1. This application conforms to the General Plan land use designation, RMH, allowing 10-20 du/acre. a) The proposed project has a density of 19 du/acre. b) Adequate on-site amenities have been provided. c) The surrounding properties may be developed in a similar manner. d) The property is near a major arterial, Alga Road, which will be able to handle the traffic generated by this project. e) The soils are stable and very little of the proper is devoted to unusable slopes. f) On-site amenities have been provided in the common recreation areas, private yards and balconies. 2. This project conforms to Title 19, the Environmental Protection Ordinance. A Declaration of Non-Significant Impact has been made for the proposed project. 3. At this time, the City Council is not prepared to find that all public facilites necessary to serve this proje will be available concurrent with need. By inclusion o an appropriate condition, this project will be required to contribute to the costs of such facilities. Since the development will pay its proportionate share of the public faciliteis it will require, the Planning Commission has determined that the requirements of the public facilites element of the General Plan have been satisfied. 4. All other requirements of the Public Facility Ordinance have been met. a) School fees will be paid at time of building permi b) Sewer service will be provided by the Leucadia County Water District. .2 ,. : // 1) e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 c) Gas, electric and water service will be provided. d) All on-site and adjacent public improvements have been installed or will be required as conditions of approval. e) The Planning Commission finds that sewer service j not available for this development as of the date of this approval. However, sewer service may be available in the future. The Planning Commission by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this condominium permit and tentative subdivision map, insured that the final map will not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service i available to serve the project. In addition, the Planning Commission has added a condition that a note shall be placed.on the final map that build- ing permits may not be issued for the condominium project unless the City Engineer determines that sewer service is available. Since the final map cannot be approved unless sewer service is availal: and building cannot occur within the project unles sewer service remains available, the Planning Corn sion is satisfied that the requirements of the pub facilities element of the General Plan have been m insorfar as they apply to sewer service for this c minium permit and tentative map approval. 5. All of the requirements of Title 21, Title 20 and the State Subdivision Map Act have been met or will be required as conditions of approval. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the following vote recommended approval of CT 79-8/CP-ll, subject to certain conditions: Conditions 1. Approval is granted for CT 79-8/CP-ll, as shown on Exhibit A, dated September 28, 1979, on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur as shown on Exhibits A, B and C. 2. The landscape plan, Exhibit D, dated August, 1979, shal be revised. The landscaping in front of the parking ar shall be adequate to screen the area from the street. . addition low shrubs shall be placed along the north and west side of the parking area and to further separate i- from the open recreation area. Landscaping shall be prc vided on either side of each stairway entrance from the driveway. This landscaping shall include trees and shrubs and can be located in permanent planters or porti containers. .3 I, e, . 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I 2o I 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e 3. The parking space adjacent to the rear property line sh be moved one foot closer to the building and shall be a maximum of 8.5 feet wide to allow adequate back-up ar 4. The three areas designated as open landscaped areas on Exhibit A, shall be provided with recreational faciliti acceptable to the Planning Director. A plan showing these facilities shall be approved prior to approval of the final map. 5. The workshop/storage room shall be designated as a bed- room for the purposes of calculating school fees. The applicant will provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit applications. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit appli 6. The required storage area shall be located in the garag in a manner acceptable to the Planning Director. The plans shall be approved prior to approval of the final map. 7. Electric garage door openers will be provided for each unit to encourage use of the garage for parking and to discourage parking in the driveway. 8. The driveway shall be posted "no parking" to allow for adequate fire access at all times. 9. A reproducible mylar of the site plan, incorporating a1 requirements of this approval, shall be submitted to th Planning Department prior to approval of the final map. 10. The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees prior to the recordation of the final map. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applican shall pay a public facility fee as established in City Council Policy No. 17. The applicant shall enter into secured agreement with the City for the payment of this fee prior to final map approval. 12. This subdivision and condominium plan is approved upon express condition that the final map shall not be appro unless the City Council finds, as of the time of such a that sewer service is available to serve the subdivisio 13. This subdivision condominium plan is approved upon the express condition that building or grading permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that such sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such permits and will continue to be available until ti of occupancy. If the City Engineer determines that sew facilities are not available, building permits will not issued. .4 , .* L 1,. * * 1 2 3 4 5 6 AYES : Schick, Rombotis, Marcus, Jose, Larson NOES : None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, that the foregoil 7 8 : ;I : -: ti e ' ' jd I $(& i*k !%!; recitations are true and correct. L 4. ,. f 4 ,. $'.. ,/-\.\.< /47 '\ .\. 1 :. ,, ! 9 \; kki;],{2, i , ,, ii '&\ ;\ -$7 EDWIN S . SCHICK, JR., 'Fha: 10 11 12 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMM$$$S ATTEST : \\ ,/"J ./ '0 ./ I /- < ,., './' C-".j/- ! ."g+/&/q l3 .<* ,,,.a 14 JW-S C. HAGAMAN', .,.sgcretary L /".,' ,' ?* .,x. . ," -... la 16 17 18 .5 19 I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I e. .I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 €3 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF CARLSBAD 1 1 1 ss I, JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly introduced, approved and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad at a regular meeting of said Commission held on the 24th day of October, 1979, by the following roll call vote: AYES : Schick, Rombotis, Marcus, Jose, Larson NOES : None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None , SBAD PLANN.TNG COMMISS / ,f+' ,/ J 9' CT 79-8/CP-ll