HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-11-14; Planning Commission; Resolution 1559b
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
l
e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1559
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF
A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PERMIT FOR A SEVEN UNIT CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF JEREZ COURT,
NORTH OF GIBRALTER.
CASE NO. : CT 79-15/CP-18
APPLICANT: Courtyard Townhomes
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, t
wit:
Lot 362 of La Costa South, Unit No. 5, in the
County of San Diego, according to Map thereof
No. 6600, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, March 10, 1970
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to th
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a reques
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, this project has been processed through enviro
mental review and a negative declaration, Log No. 581, has b
issued on this project based on the following reasons:
~
1) The project is consistent with the general plan land us
designation, and with surrounding development.
2) The site has been previously graded and is devoid of any significant flora or fauna, or any unique or histor environmental resources.
3) Only minimal site preparation is necessary in order to develop the property as proposed.
I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on October 24, 19
hold a duly noticed, public hearing as prescribed by law, tc
consider said request; and
j // I
L ..x *. 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and cons'i
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desirinc
to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating
the Carlsbad Tract (CT 79-15) and Condominium Permit (CP-18)
and found the following facts and reasons to exist:
1. Since the variance (V-294) request was denied, the
development standards have not been met.
a) The 10 foot setback between buildings and drivewa) has not been provided as required in Section 21.4;
(1) (B) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
b) The individual water meters have not been providec
required in Section 21.47.120 (11) (B) .
2. The design criteria has not been fulfilled.
a) The street system is a dominant and disruptive fez in the project (Section 21.47.120(4).
b) The common recreation area is not equally accessil
to all the units (Section 21.47,120(5)).
c) The pedestrian circulation has been provided alonc
driveway and along garage openings and cannot be considered safe. (Section 21.47.120(6)).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commisson, by the following vote,
recommended denial without prejudice, of CT 79-15/CP-18 for
reasons as set forth above.
AYES : Schick, Rombotis, Marcus, Jose, Larson
NOES : None
ABSENT : None
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the foregoir
recitations are true and correct.
ATTEST:
,2
, .. L e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 1
CITY OF CARLSBAD 1 ss
I, JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly
introduced, approved and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad at a regular meeting
of said Commission held on the 14th day of November, 1979
by the following roll call vote:
AYES : Schick, Rombotis, Freistedt, Marcus, Jose, :
NOES : None
ABSTAIN : None
ABSENT : None
CT 79-15/CP-18
.3