HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-12-12; Planning Commission; Resolution 1574Y -r. i
/ .I) 0.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I I
~
I
PLANNING COP4MISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1574
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE TH:
REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS ON THE WEST SIDE OF JEREZ
COURT, NORTH OF GIBRALTAR.
CASE NO. : V-297
APPLICANT: JEREZ COMPANY
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property,
to wit:
Lot 358 of La Costa South, Unit No. 5, in
the City of Carlsbad, according to map thereof No.
6600, as filed in the Office of the County Recorder f
San Diego County on March 10, 1970
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to
the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a requ
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; an
WHEREAS, this project has been processed through
environmental review as required in Title 19, the Environm
Protection Ordinance, and has been found to be catagorical
exempt as per Section 19.04.090 (c) 4, which exempts minor
alterations in land use limitations.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 28th day
of November, 1979, hold a duly noticed, public hearing
as prescribed by law to consider said request: and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all
persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
factors relating to V-297 and found the following facts an
reasons to exist:
~
I
\. . c.
c- I1 - 0.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstancc
on this property which do not apply generally to othel property in the vicinity and zone because the propert: is the same and shape as surrounding properties. The
property is graded and a very little of the area is devoted to unusable slope.
2. The variance is not necessary for the preservation of
substantial property right possessed by other propert;
in the vicinity and zone since all new condominiums il
the area will be required to meet the setback require]
7 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the following
8
g
vote, recommended denial of the variance for those reasons
as set forth above.
10 I
11
12
AYES: Schick, Rombotis, Jose, Leeds, Marcus,
Friestedt, Larson
NOES : None
13
16
15
recitations are true and correct. 14
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the forego
ATTEST : 18
17
\
19 ll
,,,' /-..~"~,',. '
I
20 ~ <-$z&-<, ,., " . *. ; - /*fli?&/J&-W
JAMES C. HAG-YSecrethy
21 1 ,,,/
~ARLSBAD PLANNPNG COMMISSION ,~.'
22,
23
."
-2'
.2
24
25
26
27
28
4'3 * e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CARLSBAD 1 ss.
I, JA??ES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning Commiss:
of the City of Carlsbad, California, do hereby certify that
foregoing resolution was duly introduced, approved and adopl
by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad at a reg1
meeting of said Commission held on the 12th day of December
1979, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Schick, Jose, Leeds, Larson, Rombotis, Marcus.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Friestedt
PC RES0 #1574
Page 3
-..T ./ /
.. .;" 11-
,/'
i i J
..
.. .;" 11-
,/'
i i J
..
.3