HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-01-23; Planning Commission; Resolution 1590. .. -. 0 0
I. // PLANNING COBQIISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1590
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL of CT 79-9/CP-15 FOR THE CONVERSION OF
A 172 APARTMENT INTO A CONDOMINIUM ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EL
CAMINO REAL BETWEEN HOSP WAY AND MARRON ROAD.
APPLICANT: HUNT ENTERPRISES
CASE NO: CT 79-9/CP-15
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
9 11 of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a reques
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Co
the Planning Commission on the 9th day of January, 1980, con
said application on property described as:
A portion of Lots 23, 24 and 25 in Eosp Eucalyptus Forest Company's Tract No. 1 according to Map No. 1136 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diegc
County, State of California, being Assessor's Parcel
NO. 156-08-13.
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, acting as Lead Agency, 1?
19 I/ Processed said property through environmental guidelines pur
to Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the State EIF
Guidelines. This project has been found to be exempt from
environmental review according to Section 19.04.090 (a) (8), F;
20
21
22
23 /I exempts the division of existing multiple family rental unit
!I into condominiums. 24
WHEREAS, at said Planning Commission hearing a staff re
was submitted and reviewed. At the conclusion of said heari
after consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning
25
26
27
Commission, by the following vote, recommended denial of 28
.
0, il 0 0
1 CT 79-9/CP-15, for the following reasons:
2
3
4
5
6
7
1. The project does not fulfill the design criteria as req by Section 21.47.110.
a) The project does not conform to the General Plan
and was not comprehensively d-esigned since the required storage, recreation and parking were forc
into the project.
b) The internal street system is a dominant and
disruptive feature since it isolates 2 buildings and the recreation area.
8 c) The common recreation areas and parking spaces are not readily accessible to all the units. 9
10
11
12
d) There are no provisions for pedestrian circulation
between the parking, recreation areas, the units
and the public streets.
e) The buildings have not been placed in a manner
to create private areas and reduce noise.
13
ABSENT: Friestedt, Jose. 18
ABSTAIN: Rombotis 17
NOES : None. 16
AYES : Larson, Marcus, Schick, Leeds. 15
are true and correct. 14
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recit
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25 ATTEST:
CARLSBAD PLANNING CbM4 SSION
' .,\.,i
/ PC RES0 #I590 ,y -2-
I ,. ,
<, v. e 0
1
CITY OF CARLSBAD 1 2
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
3 11 4
5
I, JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning Comissi
II of the City of Carlsbad, California, do hereby certify that
6
foregoing resolution was duly introduced, approved and adopt
by the Planning Conmission of the City of Carlsbad at a regu
meeting of said Commission held on the 23rd day of January,
by the following roll call vote:
7
8
9
10 I
11
12
AYES: Schick, Rombotis , Jose, Leeds , Marcus, Friestedt
NOES: None
Larson
13
15
ABSENT : None 14
ABSTAIN : None
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Qr/--T ?'' $4
4!"-j-jd&[kw \,~ : . ;
I, I. .~ ! i ,,',+>,
JagEs c. HAGugx- ,/*<ZARLSBAD PLANNING .~OMPIISSION
<.I ,~ "/ ,, *'
: : .i.<
i ./' /
24
25
26
27
28 PC RES0 # 1590 /I -3-