HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-02-13; Planning Commission; Resolution 1571.'
-. I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
I
I
e a
PLANNING COMMISSION EESOLUTION NO. 1571
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 01 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOPMENDING APPROVAL OF A
REVISION TO AN EXISTING TENTATIVE MAP TO PROVIDE FOR
THE PHASING OF A 211 LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED SOUTH OF
LA COSTA AVENUE, EAST OF RANCHO SANTA FE.
CASE NO. : CT 75-9 (A) /CP-16 APPLICANT : Santa Fe Knolls
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property,
to wit:
A portion of lots 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10 of Rancho Las Encinitas as shown on Map No. 848, as filed in the Office of the County Recorder for San Diego County.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to
the Planning Commission: and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a requc
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; anc
WHEREAS, this project has been processed through
environmental review as required in Title 19, the Environmc
Protection Ordinance. The proposed subdivision has complir
with the requirements of the Carlsbad Environmental Protec.
Ordinance through prior compliance (Section 19.04.153) because :
1. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR-307) was prepared
for amendments to the La Costa Master Plan and certif
by the City Council on April 27, 1976:
2. A supplement to that EIR has been prepared for the
proposed project in conformance with the requirements
of the Master Plan;
3. A report, Archaeological Investigations at Santa Fe K
has been accepted which mitigates the impacts of the proposed project on the archaeological resources of t: project site; and
,-
'. .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
4. There are no substantial changes in the proposed projt
which have not been adequately addressed by the Mastel cx Supplemental EIRs.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 28th
day of November, 1979, hold a duly noticed, public hearing
as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pe:
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all facto:
relating to the revised tentative tract map (CT 75-9(A)) a!
found the following facts and reasons to exist:
Findincrs 2
1) The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan
because :
a) The project density of 3 dwelling units per acre
conforms with the Land Use Element designation o
residential low-medium density, 0-4 du/acre; and
b) The project does not conflict with any element o
the general plan.
2) The site is physically suitable for the type and dens of development because:
a) The subdivision has been designed recognizing th, natural slope and soil constraints of the site; and
b) The low density of 3 du/acre allows for the phys consideration of the site.
3) An environmental impact report (EIR-307) was prepared
for amendments to the La Costa Master Plan and certif
by the City Council on April 27, 1976;
A supplement to that EIR has been prepared for the
proposed project in conformance with the requirements of the Master EIR;
A report, Archaeological Investigations at Santa Fe K
has been accepted which mitigates the impacts of the proposed project on the archaeological resources of t project site: and
.2
,I ..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 0
There are no substantial changes in the proposed proj
which have not been adequately addressed by the Maste or Supplemental EIR'S.
4) This project is consistent with all public facility
policies and ordinances because:
a) Sewer service is not available for this project
this time. The Planning Commission has, by incl
of an appropriate condition, insured that the
final map for each phase shall not be approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service
is available to serve the project. In addition, condition has been added requiring that a note k
placed on the final map that building permits ma
not be issued unless the City Engineer determine
that sewer service is available.
Since the final map cannot be approved unless
sewer service is available, the building cannot
occur within the project unless sewer service
remains available, the requirements of the publi
facilities element of the General Plan have beer
met insofar as they apply to sewer service for
this and tenative map approval.
b) Agreements have been made with both Encinitas ar
San Dieguito Unified School District to pay schc fees.
c) Water service will be provided by Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
d) Gas and electric service will be provided by
SDG&E.
e) All necessary on-site and adjacent public facili would be required as per the City's Public Imprc
Ordinance or as conditions of approval.
f) At this time, all other public facilities necess
to serve this project will not be available conc
with need. The Planning Commission has, by incl
of an appropriate condition, required that the project contribute to the cost of such facilitie
Since the developer will pay for its proportions
share of the public facilities which it will
require, the Planning Commission is satisfied tl:
the requirements of the public facilities elemer
of the general plan have been satisfied.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, by the following vc
recommended approval of CT 75-9(A), subject to certain cor
.3
3. ,I
I. .. a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
Conditions
1) Approval is granted for CT 75-9(A) as shown in Planni
Commission CT 75-9(A) Exhibit A, dated 11/13/79, on
file in the Planning Department, and incorporated her
by reference. Development shall be substantially as shown on said Exhibits.
2) All conditions of CT 75-9 (City Council Resolution No
4072) are still in effect, except as otherwise noted
herein.
3) Only four model homes shall be permitted as per Secti
21.60.030.
4) The applicant shall provide evidence that school fees
have been paid prior to issuance of building permits.
5) This subdivision is approved upon the express conditi
that the final map shall not be approved unless the
City Council finds at the time of such approval that
sewer service is available to serve the subdivision.
6) This subdivision is approved upon the express conditi
that building permits will not be issued for developm
of the subject property unless the City Engineer dete
that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. If the City Engin determines that sewer facilities are not available,
building permits will not be issued.
7) Conditions 23 & 24 of City Council Resolution No. 407
are deleted and replaced as follows:
Mission Estancia and La Costa Avenue shall be dedicat
and graded on the basis of an 84 foot right of way pl
slope easements as required. Improvements shall
consist of full improvements to city standards for a
foot half street, including street lights. Additiona
at each intersection with Rancho Santa Fe Road and fo
a distance of 100 feet, the pavement shall be widened
to a minimum of 40 feet and a taper from the 40 foot
width to the 32 foot width of at least 200 feet shall
be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
All slopes adjacent to the streets shall be 2:l maxim
Mission Estancia shall be constructed from Rancho San
Fe Road to the intersection with "I" Street concurren
with Unit No. 1 of the subdivision. Mission Estancia shall be constructed from ''1" Street to the proposed Costa Avenue intersection concurrent with Unit No. 3
the Subdivision.
La Costa Avenue shall be constructed concurrent with Unit No. 3 of the subdivision.
4
,A ' **I , . ll
" " . . .e *.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
a 0
The applicant shall enter into a secured agreement fo~
improvement of the northerly half of Mission Estancia
along the proposed park site frontage to City of Carl2
standards.
8) Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be widened and/or striped 1
provide a separate southbound left turn lane into
Mission Estancia and a separate northbound right turn
lane into the street. The widening and/or striping
shall extend approximately 600 feet north of the
intersection and approximately 400 feet south and sha.
be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This work shall be accomplished with the construction
of Unit No. 1 of the project.
The eastern half street of Rancho Santa Fe Road shall be improved at the intersection of La Costa Avenue sufficient to provide turning moves in and out of La Costa Avenue and shall be designed to the satisfactio: of the City Engineer. This work shall be accomplishec concurrently with the construction of La Costa Avenue
9) The applicant shall pay a public facility fee as established in City Council Policy No. 17 prior to issuance of building permits. This approval is expres;
conditioned upon the applicant entering into a securec
agreement to secure payment of this fee prior to apprc of the resolution for CT 75-9(A) by the Planning Corn.
10) Brush clearance shall be provided around the edges of
each unit to the satisfaction of the City of Carlsbad Fire Marshall.
11) A looped water line shall be installed from I'H" Stree
in Unit #3 to "F" Street in Unit #2, to the satisfact
of the City of Carlsbad Fire Xarshall. This line sha be installed concurrent with the development of Unit
#3.
AYES: Schick, Rombotis, Jose, Leeds, Marcus, Friestedt, Larson
22 ll NOES: None
23 I/ NOF7, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the forego
24
25 j 26 I/
27
28
recitations are true and correct.
ATTEST :
"
ad- f .,-' . .
. .I - ~~Y<GG~N ;,*zeta+' . ..&Lfl/
..':.GARLSBAD PLANP~ING,..+OMPIISSION
_-!-I/- .5
., d
r . ’, -.
. ,. . , ..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
* *
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss CITY OF CARLSBAD 1
I, JAMES C. HAGAMAN, Secretary to the Planning Commiss.
Of the City of Carlsbad, California, do hereby certify that
foregoing Resolution was duly introduced, approved and adop-
by the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of Fe:bruary
1980, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Schick, Rombotis, Jose, Leeds, Marcus, and Lars
NOES : None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT : None
and Friestedt
PC RES0 #1571
Page 6
.””?. .4
J
.6