HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-03-12; Planning Commission; Resolution 1606-* I
-
r*:r /I e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1606
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 77-2(B), TO AMEND
A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 2 OFFICES AND A
BANK ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HOSP WAY AND
EL CAMINO REAL.
APPLICANT: HUGHES INVESTMENTS CASE NO: SDP-77-2 (B)
7
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved Site Developmer 11
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request 9
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
8 City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and
lo provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
l2
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code 13
Plan 77-2 with Resolution No. 1359, dated April 27, 1977; and
l4/1 the Planning Commission did, on the 27th day of February, 198C
l5 11 considered a modification to approved Site Development Plan 77
l6
18
17
on property described as:
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 8586 recorded in the Office of
the County Recorder of San Diego County, California,
on March 30, 1979.
19 I WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has determined that SDP 77-
2o 1 will not have a significant impact on the environment in that
21
compliance with the City of Carlsbad's Environmental Protectic 22
Negative Declaration for SDP 77-2 has been filed as in full
23
be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to 26
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring f 25
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and conside 24
Ordinance of 1972; and
27 I( Site Development Plan No. 77-2 (B) .
28 //I//
. ., . -
b. > 0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearin
the Commission finds the following findins and conditions
to exist:
Findings :
1) The proposed project is consistent with the land use
designation of Professional and Related Commercial since
the proposed uses will be professional offices and a bank
2) This project is consistent with the Public Facilities Ele
because:
a) 15 edu's were provided through the second phase sewe
allocation.
b) All necessary on-site and adjacent public improvemen will be required as conditions of approval.
c) The applicant has proposed and is required by the
inclusion of an appropriate condition, to pay a
public facilities fee. Payment of this fee will
ensure that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the general plan
d) The applicant has agreed and is required by the
inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a
public facilities fee. Performance of that contract
and payment of the fee will enable this body to fnd that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the general plan
3) The proposed project is compatible with surrounding developments, both existing and proposed because:
a) Adequate yards and landscaping have been provided.
b) The property is separated from R property to the
east by a steep slope and from R property to the
south by a solid masonry wall.
Conditions
1) Approval is granted for SDP 77-2(B) as shown on Planning
Commission Exhibits A & B dated 2/11/80, incorporated
by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. I -2-
&.,.i :
b'
*:' I/ e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
2) A reproducible mylar of the site development plan in-
corporating all changes in the conditions shall be submit to and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuanc of building permits.
3) A six foot stuccoed block wall with a tile cap to match
the buildings shall be placed along the south property
line. The fence shall be no higher than 42 inches in the
front yard.
4) This project is approved upon the express condition that
building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determin
that sewer facilities are available at the time of appli-
cation for such permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. If the City Engineer determines
that sewer facilities are not available, building permits will not be issued.
5) A complete landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitt
to and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuanc of building permits.
6) Prior to final occupancy, the applicant shall make all areas of no parking for fire access as required by the
Fire Department.
7) The applicant or his agent shall review and approve all
tenant improvement drawings prior to submittal to the
City for building permit.
8) All signs on the property shall conform to the Sign
Ordinance, Chapter 21.42. The monument sign shown on Exhibit A is specifically not approved.
9) All trash enclosures shall be constructed with six foot
high stucco walls with wood gates.
10) This approval is expressly conditioned on the payment by
the applicant for a public facilities fee as required
by City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, on
file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by
reference, and according to the agreement executed by
the applicant for payment of said fee. A copy of that
agreement, dated 1/4/80 , is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and the project
cannot proceed and this approval shall be void.
/I///
//I//
I//// -3-
* 4'
, +.' :
$4 .*; I/ e ai
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Of the
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held
on the 12th day of March, 1980, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Schick, Marcus, Leeds, Larson
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Jose
ABSENT: Friestedt, Rombotis
19 1
20
21
22
23 ATTEST :
-4-