Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-03-26; Planning Commission; Resolution 1609- ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 * e l PLANNING COBMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1609 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COEY4ISSION OF TEE CITY OF CARLSEAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOPIMENDING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LUCIERNAGA STREET, LA COSTA. APPLICANT: NOORT-STOJIC CASE NO: CT 80-2/CP-48 APPROVAL FOR AN 18 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit: Lot PJo. 399, La Costa Meadows Unit No. 2, Map 6905. has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlshad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, this project has been processed through environl review as required in Title 19, the Environmental Protection Ordinance. An Environmental Impact Assessment (Log No. 645) 1 been prepared and a Negative Declaration issued based on the following justification: 1) The site has been previously graded and is devoid of any significant environmental resources. 2) A relatively minor amount of additional grading is proposed. This will not adversely affect any significant environmental resources. 3) The area surrounding the project has been graded and generally committed to urban development. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 12th day of March, 1980, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and //// //// -/ e 0 1 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consi 2 the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit; and 4 be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to 3 all testinony and arguments, if any, of a11 persons desiring 5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY XESOLVED by the Planning 6 Commission as follows: 7 A. That the above recitations are true and correct. 8 B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hear. to exist: 9 the Commission finds the following findings and conditic 10 Findings 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I 1) The project is consistent with the city's current general plan since it is within the density range specified for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Flan and, in addition, the project qualifies for a density at the high en6 of the range, as conditioned, sufficient on-site amenities have been provided. 2) The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential developnent at the proposed density and still meet all the requirements of the city's condominium ordinance and subdivision regula- tions e 3) The project is consistent with all city public facility policies and ordinances because: a) The Leucadia County Water District has allocated- sufficient sewer hookups for the project. b) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclussion of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that con- tract and payment of the fee enables this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by the General Flan. c) School fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding are required at the time of building permits pursua: to Chapter 21.55 of the Carlsbad Xunicipal Code. //// 28 1/11 I1 PC RES0 #1609 -2- I ,' .' 'I // e e 1 d) Water service will be provided by the Carlsbad 2 Municipal Water District, and the applicant is reql to comply with their rules and reulations. 3 4 5 e) Gas and electric service will be provide6 by San Diego Gas and Electric. f) All necessary public improvements have been either provided or will be required as conditions of apprc 6 7 4) The design of the project and all required improvements will not cause any significant environmental impacts, 8 and a Declaration of Negative Environmental Impact be has been issued by the Planning Director on February 7, 1980, Log Eo. 645. 9 10 11 12 13 5) The proposed condominium project meets the criteria of Chapter 21.47 (condominiums) since: a) The condominiums meet the design criteria of Chapter 21.47.110 since the overall plan is compre- hensive embracing land, buildings, landscaping and their relationships, the driveway is not a dominant feature, and sufficient circulation and on-site amenities are provided. 14 15 16 17 l8 I 19 ! 20 21 22 23 24 b) Storage space, laundry facilities, open recreation areas, parking facilities, refuse areas, separate utilities and requirements of Section 21.47.130 hav been met or will be made conditions of approval. Conditions : 1) Approval is granted for CT 80-2/CP-48 as shown on Exhibi "A" to CT 80-2/CP-48 dated February 15, 1980 and Exhibit B, C-1, C-2, D-1 and D-2 to CT 80-2/CP-48 dated February 25, 1980, on file in the Planning Department and incor- porated by reference. Development shall occur substanti as shown on these exhibits unless otherwise noted in the conditions. 2) The northernmost unit of building no. 4 shall be deleted The remaining area between building nos. 3 and 4 shall b devoted to landscaping, recreation area, and an area for refuse disposal separate from the units. These required changes shall be noted on the final condominium site pla and on the final map. 25 26 3) The applicant shall prepare a reproducible copy of the ments of the condominium permit approval and shall be final condominium site plan incorporating all require- nN subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Gt li 28 //// PC RES0 #I609 li -3- .. " .I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I 0 e 4) The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit application. 5) This subdivision and condominium plan is approved upon the express condition that the final map shall not be ay unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision. 6) This subdivision and condominium plan is approved upon 1 express condition that building permits will not be isst for development of the subject property unless the City Engineer determines that such sewer facilities are avai: able at the time of application for such permits and wil continue to be available until time 0-E occupancy. If the City Engineer determines that sewer facilities are I available, building permits will not be issued. 7) In order to provide for fire protection during the construction period, the applicant shall maintain passable vehicular access to a11 buildings. In additior adequate fire hydrants and/or off-site stand pipes with required fire flows shall be installed on and/or off site if recommended by the Fire Chief or his designee. 8) Street trees of a variety approved by the Parks and Recreation Department shall be installed to city specifications at 40 foot intervals along all public str frontages. 9) All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times, and shall have posted "No Parking Fire Access Lane. " 10) This approval is expressly conditioned on the payment by the applicant of a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated August 29, 1979, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for palyment of said fee. A copy of that agreement, dated 2/5/80, is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If said fee is no paid as promised, this application will not be consisten with the Gefieral Plan and the project cannot proceed and this approval shall be void. 11) The developer shall receive the approval of the City Eng: for a site grading plan and obtain a grading permit prio: to issuance of building permits. /I// PC RES0 #1609 -4- a *' * : .9 LI -* II 6 0 II 1 2 12) Automatic garage door openers shall be installed by the any unit. applicant on all garage doors prior to final occupancy c 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 I 19 I 20 21 22 13) The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees prior the the recordation of the final map. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, helc on the 26th day of March, 1980, by the following vote, to wil AYES: Schick, Larson, Marcus, Leeds, Jose NOES : None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Friestedt, Rombotis ATTEST : CARLSBAD PLANNING 60- MISS l! -5- I1