Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-04-23; Planning Commission; Resolution 16284 b, e m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1628 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A VARI- ANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 10' TO 0' ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PONTO AVENUE, SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD IN THE RDM ZONE. APPLICANT: COAST WASTE MANAGEMENT CASE NO: v-304 ~. ~~ WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit: That portion of the South two-thirds of Lot 4 (South- east Quarter of the Southeast Quarter) of Section 29, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meri- dian, in the County of San Diego, State of California, map filed Noven?ber 4, 1948. has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the ning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 23rd day of April, 1980, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considc all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring . heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to V-31 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning COI sion of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearil the Commission recommends DENIAL of V-304, based on the : lowing findings: 28 //// +, ' 4c* c* ' 0 m I. I1 Findings: 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ,2.5 ,,' ," .' ,,,' j/ 26 "' I 1) That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circu! stances or conditions applicable to the property or the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone; 2) That such variance is not necessary for the preserva and enjoyment of a substantial property right posses by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question; 3) That the granting of such variance will be material1 detrimental to the public welfare and injurious to t property or improvements in such vicinity and zone i which the property is located. 4) That the granting of such variance will adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the ning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on t 23rd day of April , 19 80 , by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Schick, Leeds, Larson, Friestedt, Rombotis NOES : None ABSENT: Marcus, Jose \ ABSTAIN : None CARLSBAD PLANNING do ISSION \"1 q ATTEST : +,9pn& ,I -,,,.,.;9 i </ w .J%-lES C. H%A&IAW, ,.CSKRETARY iT ~ARLSBAD PLAHNING,~OMMISSION ,.' 27 PC RESO* # 1628 /(Page 2 28