HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-06-11; Planning Commission; Resolution 1645L 0 e
I. I1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1645
2
3
4
5
6
7
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SITE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 80-6, FOR A 300 UNIT
RESIDENTIAL PROJECT TO INCLUDE AN 86 UNIT
DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF MELROSE AVENUE EXTENDED,
BETWEEN CORINTIA STREET EXTENDED AND ALGA ROAD
EXTENDED.
APPLICANT : WOODWARD COMPANIES
CASE NO: SDP 80-6
CONDOMINIUM PERMIT AND A 214 UNIT PLANNED UNIT
8
of Carlsbad, and referred to the Planning Commission; and 9
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the (
LO WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
11// provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
12 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Cod1
l3 I considered said request on property described as: l4
the Planning Commission did, on the 11th day of June, 1980,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Those portions of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30
and the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 12
South, Range 3 west, San Bernardino Meridian, County of
San Diego, State of California.
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering a
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to b
heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to Sit
Development Plan No. 80-6.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Commission recommends APPROVAL of SDP 80-6, based on the
following findings and subject to the following conditic
27
28
Findings:
1) The site is physically suitable for the type, density an
11
: ',.: II e e
1
2
design of the development since the property is adequate
in size and topography to accommodate the project and stl
meet all city regulations.
3
4
2) The project is consistent with all city public facility
policies and ordinances since:
5 I! a) The applicant has been allocated sufficient sewer
hookups for the project.
6
7.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
b) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inc: of an appropriate condition to pay a public facilit: fee. Performance of that contract and payment of tl fee will enable this body to find that public facil: will be available concurrent with need as required I the General Plan.
c) All necessary public improvements have either been provided or will be required as conditions of appro
d) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition, insured that the project wil
not be approved unless the City Council finds that
sewer service is available to serve the project. S
the project cannot be approved unless sewer service
available, and building cannot occur within the pro unless sewer service remains available, the Planninj Commission is satisfied that the requirements of thl public facilities element of the General Plan have :
met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this
project.
17
Declaration of Negative Environmental Impact has been is 18
3) The design of the project and all required improvements >
not cause any significant environmental impacts, and a
by the Planning Director on April 4, 1980, Log No. 688. 19 I
20 4) The proposed development is consistent with the Land Use
Element and all other applicable elements of the General
21 5) The proposed development as conditioned is consistent wi
22
23 Conditions
24 1) Approval is granted for SDP 80-6, as shown on Exhibit "B dated June 2, 1980, incorporated by reference and on fil the Planning Department. Development shall occur substa 25 as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions.
26 2) All conditions of PUD-20, CT 80-9 and CP-60 are incorpor
27 approval of this project.
surrounding development, both existing and future.
herein by reference and shall be strictly complied with
28 //// I1 PC RES0 #1645 -2-
, ,. L -*
L e e
1 3) The expiration date of the Site Development Plan shall
2 coincide with the expiration date of CT 80-9.
4) The applicant shall submit a reproducible copy of the Si
all requirements of CT 80-9/PUD-20, and CP-60 prior to f
3
map approval of Phase I of CT 80-9. 4
Development Plan to the Planning Director incorporating
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 5
6
11th day of June, 1980, by the following vote, to wit: 7
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, Californa, held
a
NOES : None 9
AYES: Schick, Larson, Friestedt, Marcus, Leeds and Jose
10 ABSENT : Rombotis
11
12
13
ABSTAIN : None
14
15 ATTEST:
CARLSBAD PLANNING CO ISS Yr
16
17
18.
d
20
21
22
23
24
,
!I
,f7*.:'
,/ ',/'
MMISSION 7
25 11
26 II 27
28
PC RES0 #1645
-3-