HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-12-10; Planning Commission; Resolution 17354 \,
G- I/ e e
1 '?LmxNG 'COmTSSrQN 'Ri3$OLUTXQJ!T No .' 17'35
2
3
4
5
6
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNTNG COIQiISSTON 0% THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNTA, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-3, MULTIPLE FMILY RESIDENTTAL TO R-P, RESIDENTTAL PRO- FESSIONAL ON PROPERTY GENERaLLY LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON STREET BETWEEN
LAGUNA DRIVE AND HOME STREET. APPLICANT: BANDEMER AND SCHLEHUBER .cASE No : . . . .zc .2.21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. -
7 WHEREAS, a verifled application for certain property, 1
8 wit:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
I I
All that portion of Tract 117 of Carlsbad Lands in Map 1661 recorded March 1, 1915
has been filed with the city of Carlsbad, and referred to tl
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as pro'
by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 10th day 0:
~ December, 1980, hold a duly noticed public hearing as presc:
~
by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and cons:
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desirinc
be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating tc
the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hea: the Commission recommends' DENIAL without prejudice of
based on the following findings:
I/ Findings :
1) The proposed R-P zone would be inconsistent with the 28 surrounding zoning ., and land use. The property to the
$ .. ..-
c e e
1
2
south. and east of the. subject pr~perty is. zoned for and
developed wl'th. res2dential use.s that probably will not c0nver.te.d to of fZce purposes in --the near future.
3
4
5
6
7
8
4) The Planning Director has determined that this project
9
10
11 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of th
l2 Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he1
13 the 10th day of December, 1980, by the following vote, to wi
2) The existing R-3 zone is- consistent with the General P1 and represents the most appropriate land use for the su property at tkis time,
3) Jefferson Street presently acts as a natural boundary
between office uses on the west side of the street and residential uses on the east side of the street.
not have a significant impact on the environment and therefore has issued a negative declaration on November
1980, and that the Planning Cammission concurs with the
Director's determination and hereby approves the negati
declaration for ZC-221.
14
15
AYES: MARCUS, ROMBOTIS, LARSON, LEEDS, FRIESTEDT, L'HEUREUX AND JOSE
NOES : NONE
16
17
ABSENT : NONE
ABSTAIN : NONE
18
19
20
21
ATTEST:
.33t,,L A MARY MA S, Chairman
CARLSB D PLANNING COMMIE
OMMISSION
PC RES0 31735 "2 7.