HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-04-01; Planning Commission; Resolution 1779.\c
Y e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1'7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1779
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-3 AND R-A TO RD-M (RESIDENTIAL DENSITY MULTIPLE) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF OCEAN STREET BETWEEN THE AT&SF RAILROAD AND THE PACIFIC OCEAN. APPLICANT: NATIVE SUN INVESTMENT GROUP CASE NO: ZC-226
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property,
to wit:
All that portion of Lot 2 and a portion of Lot 3,
Section 1, Township 12 South, Ranges west, San
Bernardino Meridian, in the city of Carlsbad. accord to official plat thereof, lying-southwesterly of the AT&SF Railway.
has been filed with the city of Carlsbad, and referred to
the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as
provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 11th day
March, 1981, hold a duly noticed public hearing and a continul
public hearing on March 25, 1981, as prescribed by law to
1 consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all perso:
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plannin,
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public heari:
the Commission DENIES ZC-226, based on the following findings:
,b
1
1. a e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Findings:
1) The property consists of two identifiable portions each
with different characteristics and ability to support
development.
2) The requested RD-PI zone is not appropriate for the lower portion of the property which is presently zoned R-A.
with this project (EIR 80-4 P indicates that changing the zoning on the lower portion of the property may cause significant environmental impacts and could give the low' portion of the property a density that is inappropriate the site.
3) The Environmental Impact Re ort reviewed in conjunction
4) In order to mitigate against significant environmental
impacts on the Buena Vista Lagoon, the lower portion of -
property may be a logical extension of the existing open
space designation surrounding other portions of the lagoc
12 '
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2& 1
5) The upper (bluff) portion of the property which is
presently zoned R-3 may be appropriate for rezoning to RD-M. However, because the project as designed involves
both the upper and lower portions of the property and
because of the environmental difficulties of the site,
rezoning of the upper (bluff) portion is not appropriate
this time.
I///
///I
///I
I///
I///
I///
//I/
I///
I///
//I/
I///
//I/
///I
PC RES0 #I779 -2-
*
2.. - e e
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
2
wit: 4
held on the 1 st day of April, 1981, by the following vote, tc 3
the Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, California,
5 AYES : Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Larson, Jose, an
6 NOES : None. Friestedt.
7
ABSTAIN: Commissioners Rombotis and L'Heureux. a
ABSENT: Commissioner Leeds.
9
10 /I
11
12
13
14 ATTEST :
?LA L MARY MARHJS. Chairman
CARLSBA, PLANNING COMMISSU [
19 I/ I 20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 PC RES0 #I779 -3-