HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-04-28; Planning Commission; Resolution 1946. C' ID '9
1 ll PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1946
2
3
4
5
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR 80-9A) FOR A
PROJECT GENERALLY INCLUDING: 1) ~A REVISED PARKS AND
RECREATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERA6 PLAN; AND 2) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT GPA-63.
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
CASE NO: EIR 80-9A 61) WHEREAS, on April 28, 1982, the Planning Commission, of
7 /lcity of Carlsbad, held public hearing on EIR 80-9A pursuant ti
811provisions of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
9 // WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the commt
lo
hearing; and I'
and documents of all those persons testifying at the public
12 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received EIR 80-9A
l3 according to the requirements of Title 19 of the Carlsbad
I.4 IIMunicipal Code;
15 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by-the Planning Commissior
"/Ithe city of Carlsbad as follows:
l7 111. That the foregoing recitations are 'true and correct.
l8 2.
19
20
21 3.
22
23
24
That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 80-9A will be amended to include the comments and documents of those testifying at the public hearing and responses thereto ht found to be in good faith and reason by incorporating a c of the minutes of said public hearings into the report.
That the Planning Commission finds and determines that tlr
Environmental Impact Report EIR 80-9A has been completed conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act
the state guidelines implementing said Act, and the provisions of Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code ant that the Planning Commission has reviewed, considered ant evaluated the information contained in the report.
25
26
27
28
4. That the Environmental Impact Report EIR 80-9A as so amer and evaluated, is recommended for acceptance and certification as the final Environmental Impact Report ar that the final Environmental Impact Report as recommendet adequate and provides reasonable ififormation on the projc and all reasonable and feasible alternatives thereto, including no project.
d- /I I@ *
1
2
3
4
5
6
5. That each and every significant environmental impact
identified in the Environmental Impact Report would be
overruled or counterbalanced by changes or alteration in project which would mitigate against said adverse impact in certain circumstances, that mitigation of such adversl impacts would not be feasible under the circumstances an1 under the economic and social needs objectives and conce. in providing the improvements if the project were to be
approved, would be included as conditions of approval of
project.
7
8
9
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, California, held
the 28th day of April, 1982, by the following vote, to wit:
10
11
AYES: Farrow, Schlehuber, Rombotis, L'Heureux, Friestedt
NOES : None
Jose and Marcus
12 /I ABSENT : None
l3 I1 ABSTAIN: None
14
15
16
17
18 ATTEST:
c
VERNONSJ. FARROW, JRl, Chairm;
CARLSB~D PL&NING CO~MISSION \..*. ,a> -. _,
e -/,x" //q ;p 20 .".+f,. f4f-[? 3; ". *%#+G&,Td&&
ARLSBAD PLANNIN/G/ICOMMISSION
MES C. HkSK/MAN',,,EF&cretary Y' //
:../ 22 Y j
23 I1 24
25
26
27
28 PC RES0 # 1946 -2-