HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-05-26; Planning Commission; Resolution 1963c.. - 7. II m 0
7
I /I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1963 2
3
4
5
6
7
€3
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT TO REVISE THE SITE PLAN OF LOT 16 ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVENI
ENCINAS APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF CANNON ROAD
APPLICANT: GRANT
CASE NO: PUD-17 (B)
i WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to
Parcel 16 of the Parcel Map 11457 filed in the
office of the County Recorder of San Diego County
July 7, 1981
9
10
11
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
12\lprovided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
13
14 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 26th day of
May, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed
15
16
by law, to consider said request: and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considt
17
18
19
20
all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring
be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to
Planned Unit Development; and
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Cor
sion as follows:
(A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
(R) That based on the evidence presented at the public heari:
Commission hereby APPROVES PUD-l7(R), based on the follol
findings and subject to the following conditions:
IlFindings:
1) The proposed buildings will be architecturally compatibl
the other buildings in the Carlsbad Commercial Center fo
reasons stated in the Staff Report. 28
.'f ' II e
1
2
2) The proposed buildings will not have an adverse impact on existing residences to the west for the reasons stated in staff report.
3
4
5
6
7
3) This project has already been considered in conjunction w
proviously certified environmental document and a Notice
Prior Environmental Compliance was issued on April 30, 19
4) The proposed planned industrial development at the subjec
location is both necessary and desirable to provide a corn hensively and imaginatively designed facility which will tribute to the general well being of the community.
8 5) The proposed development will not be detrimental to the h
9
safety or general welfare of persons residing or working
or improvements in this area.
same vicinity, nor would the project be injurious to proF
10
11
12
13 the General Plan.
14 8) The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Pe
15 mance of that contract and payment of the fee will enable body to find that public facilities will be available con
16 rent with need as required by the General Plan.
17 9) That the applicant has provided sufficient additional ame including increased landscaping along Avenida Encinas, an
18 increase of the number of parking spaces required under t
zone to justify the modifications to the P-M zone yard an
19 area requirements.
20 Conditions
21 1) Approval is granted for PUD-17(B) as shown on Exhibits "P
"F", dated May 10, 1982 on file at the Planning Departmer
22 incorporated by reference. Unless otherwise noted hereir Exhibits E, I, H and M, dated August 26, 1980, and Exhibi
23 dated December 4, 1980, of PUD-17 (A) shall remain valid
this development. Development shall occur substantially
24 shown on these exhibits unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
25
26
27 ////
6) All design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.110 and a1
minimum development standards set forth in Section 21.45.
will be met.
7) The proposed project will be consistent with all elements
2) All previous conditions of PUD-l7(A) Resolution No. 1704 no longer applicable and shall be superseded by the cone of approval contained herein.
//// 28 PC RES0 # 1963 -2-
,.I ' II e 0 /I
1
3) All conditions of approval of Resolution No. 1703, €or 2
4
3
CT-80-15(A), shall be met. Failure to do so shall void
Planning Department
5 4) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant
submit a final Planned Unit Development Plan, incorporat
6 all conditions of approval of CT 80-15(A) and PUD-l7(S),
the approval of the Planning Director.
7 5) The standards of the P-M (Planned Industrial) zone regar
8 permitted uses, conditional uses, building height, outdc storage and industrial waste discharge shall apply to t'r: subject property. No encroachment into any required yar
unless a revised Planned Unit Development application ic
Planned Unit Development.
9 other than is permitted by this application shall be all
10 approved.
11
12
13
14
15
6) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the appli
shall submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan, E to the approval of the Planning Director. Native drougk
tolerant plant species shall be utilized to the maximum
feasible. Said landscape plan shall include a detailed description of the employee recreation area. Said lands
plan shall include solid planting of the west property 1 visually screen the project from the adjacent properties the west.
16 7) All roof appurtenances shall be completely screened fron
Encinas and integrated into the design of the building, 17 adjacent properties to the west, Interstate 5, and Avenj
subject to the approval of the Planning Department pri01 18 the issuance of building permits.
19
20
21
22
23
24
1 8) All lighting of buildings and parking areas shall be di~ away from adjacent properties, in particular those residential properties to the west, so that no direct 1: or light spillover occurs on any such properties.
9) Per the requirements of the P-M zone, noise emanating fl
the project shall not exceed a level of 45 dBA at any property line.
10) All buildings on lot 16 shall maintain a minimum frontyi setback of 35 feet.
25
26
////
////
27 /I ////
PC RES0 # 1963 -3- 28
* ,e e
8
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
2
the 26th day of May, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: 3
Planning Commission of the City,of Carlsbad, California, held
4
5
AYES : Chairman Farrow; Commissioners Schlehuber, Rombotis, Friestedt and Rawlins
6
7
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioners Marcus and Jose
8 I1 ABSTAIN: None
9
10
11
12 CARLSB~ZANNING CO~SSION
20
21
22
23
24
25 I;
26
27
28
PC RES0 # 1963 -4-