The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-09-08; Planning Commission; Resolution 2019c *ill e e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2019 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI' OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SP-l80(B) AMENDING THE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE CARL RESEARCH CENTER GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SID CAMINO REAL, NORTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. APPLICANT: KOLL COMPANY CASE NO. : SP-180 (B) WHEREAS, a verified application for certain prope wit: Those portions of Lots "F" and "G" of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the City of Carlsbad, San Diego Coun of Calfornia, according to the partition map ther 832, filed in the Office of the County Recorder o County, November 16 , 1896. has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; an WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 8th September, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing, as pr by law, to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public bearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pe desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all facto relating to the Specific Plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plan Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public he the Planning Commission recommends that the City Coun an ordinance approving the amendments to SP-180 as de in Exhibit "A" dated September 8, 1982, attached here incorporated herein by reference, based on the follow findings and conditions: //// - -11 e e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I Findings 1) The proposed changes incorporated into the Revised Spc Plan 180 are necessary and desirable for reasons statc staff report. 2) The proposed changes will not be detrimental to adjoi~ properties because of the requirement for a site deve: plan as described in the staff report. 3) This project will not cause any significant adverse iI the environment because a Negative Declaration was is: the Land Use Planning Manager and approved by the Plal Commission on September 8, 1982. 4) The project is consistent with all city public facili and ordinances because the Specific Plan prohibits an development on the site without the proper public improvements. 5) The amendments to the Specific Plan are consistent wi Carlsbad General Plan and with Sections 65451 and 654 Government Code which regulate the use of Specific P1 Conditions 1) That all findings and conditions contained in City Co Ordinances No. 9561 and No. 9594 originally approving and SP-l80(A) shall still be valid and are applicable amendment to the Specific Plan. //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// //// PC RES0 NO. 2019 -2- * I1 0 e 1 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting 3 4 5 Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, Calfornia, he: 8th day of September, 1982, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Farrow, Commissioners Marcus, I Schlehuber, Jose and Rawlins. 6 7 NOES : None. ABSENT: Commissioner Friestedt. 8 9 ABSTAIN : None. LO 11 12 :-. & , ...y VEI CAI I.3 It ATTEST: 14 15 16 17 18 19 I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RES0 NO. 2019 -3- I1 e 0 EXHIBIT A TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2019 RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT TO SP- 1 80 Building Height, Page 16 Existing Language. The existing language reads as follows: "The maximum height of structures within the indust: park shall not exceed 35 feet. However, it is reco! that this project may contain sites where taller bu would be appropriate. Any request for a structure excess of 35 feet would require an amendment to the zone and to this Specific P1a:n." Proposed Language. The amendled language would be: "Structures up to 35 feet in 'height are permitted i, accordance with the provisions of the Plan. Struct. may exceed 35 feet provided that a site development is first submitted by the applicant and approved by Planning Commission in accordance with Chapter 21.0 Development Overlay Zone) of the Municipal Code, ex' that the site development plan shall also be submit the City Council for approval following approval by Planning Commission. The major intent and purpose of the site plan revie be to ensure that structures in excess of 35 feet w 1. Be designed and located to provide adequate se from adjacent public streets and adjacent prop 2. Not adversely impact other developments in the 3. Not create excessive den.sity. In evaluating the Site Plan, the following design guidelines should be considered: 1. Setbacks. The required streetside setbacks fa arterial or collector street should be increas one (1) foot for each one (1) foot of building in excess of 35 feet. The required streetside setback for any local or any interior setback should be increased by half (1/2) foot for each one (1) foot of build height in excess of 35 fieet. a e In order to encourage varia.tion in setbacks and building heights, these increased setbacks shall apply only to building elements exceeding 35 feet Thus, a low-rise element could observe the origin setbacks, and taller elements have increased setbacks. 2. Floor Area Ratio. Buildings exceeding 35 feet in height should have a maximum floor area ratio of 2: 1 .I1 No site development plan shall be approved under this specific plan until that finding can be made that all buildings in excess of 35 feet in height have an interior sprinkler system and that fire prevention and fire suppression materials and/or equipment have been incorporated into buildings over 35 feet to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief. All buildings within the boundaries of this specific plan shall meet part 77 of the Federal Aviation regulations regarding height. Building plans shall be submitted to the FAA for review prior to city approval Site Coverage, Page 16 Site Coverage, Page 16 Existing Language. "Maximum building coverage shall not exceed 50% of the lot area. I' Proposed Language . ? "The maximum building coverage of all buildings including accessory buildings, but not including parking structures or surface parking, shall not exceec 50% of the gross lot area. However, in order to prevent excessive coverage of the buildable portion of such lots, maximum coverage shall be limited to 75% of the buildable area or 50% of the gross lot area, whichever is less. The buildable area of the lot is defined as the gross lot area minus those slope areas, natural open space areas, and canyon areas included in the common space maintenance easements." Parking, Page 16 Existing Language. There is no provision for compact parking spaces. -2- .. e e Proposed Language . "The Land Use Planning Manager may approve the reduction in size of up to 25% of the total required parking spaces to accomodate compact cars provided that: (a) Compact car spaces are located in separate parkir aisles from standard-sized spaces; (b) Aisles and spaces for compact car spaces are clearly marked with permanent material denoting 'Compact Car Only'; (c) Compact car spaces shall be located in close proximity to the facility which they serve so as to encourage their maximum usage; (d) Compact car spaces must be a minimum width of 7- 1/2 feet and a minimum length of 15 feet." Entryways, Page 23 Existing Language. "All primary entryways to the industrial park shall receive special landscape and sign treatment. Such treatment shall include a distinctive landscape desigr consisting of groundcover and hedgerows combined with contour berming. Signing within the entryways shall t limited to ground signs which contain only the name of the industrial park and conform to the sign and graphi standards of this plan. Plans fIor entryways shall be submitted to the Land Use Planning Manager for approv; prior to development." Proposed Language. The following paragraph should be added to the above language: "Variance #340 permits a special- entryway sign at El Camino Real and D Street. As a condition of approval of the variance, the City determined that 'no ground signs other than the approved entry sign shall be oriented to El Camino Real."' Permitted Uses, Page 13 Existing Language. The existing Specific Plan permits restaurants in Area I1 (CommerciLal) subject to a conditional use permit. -3- ., -8 e.. e Proposed Language. The following language would be added to the list of permitted uses in Area I ~ (industrial). "11. (p. 12) Restaurants, subject to the review and approval of a conditional use permit." Sidewalk Plan, Page 16 Existing Language. Arterial type streets (B Street and College Boulevard) will have sidewalks meeting City Standards on both sides of the street. Local type streets may have sidewalks on only one side of the street. Proposed Language. A comprehensive sidewalk plan will be submitted for approval by the City Engineer. Ground Signs, Page 24 Existing Language. None Proposed Language. (addition) 3. d. No ground sign other than the approved entryway sign shall be approved so as to be visible alon! El Camino Real. Parking, Page 16 Existing 3. Office. One space for each 350 square feet of gross floor area. Proposed 3. Office. One space for each :250 square feet of gross floor area. CDG/ar 911 4\82 -4-