HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-09-22; Planning Commission; Resolution 2021r: "r b -
, .. ll e e
1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI'I 2
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2021
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to t 9
05. 8
wit: 7
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain proper 6
CASE NO. : V-34 1 5
HILLSIDE. 4
THE STREET SIDEYARD SETBACK FROM 10' TO 1 1/2' GEP; 3
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIAp DENYING A VARIANCE TO RET:
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ISLE DRIVE AND
APPLICANT: SKIP HORTON
Lot 100 of Carlsbad Tract 72-18, Unit No. 2, APN 2
10 Planning Commission; and
11 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a I
12
16
by law to consider said request; and 15
September, 1982, hold a duly noticed public hearing as pres 14
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 22nd 13
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; anc
relating to 11-341. 19
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factor 18
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all per 17
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
2o I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planr
21
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 22
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
23
24
25
26
27
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hear Commission DENIES V-341, based on the following findins
Findings:
1) That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumst
applicable to this property that do not apply general11
properties in the same vicinity and zone since the pro1 more buildable area than other similar corner lots as : in the staff reDort.
28 ////
11
S" b -
L c ll 0 e
1
2
2)
4
3
5 3)
That the subject property is not being denied a substar property right possessed by other properties in the san vicinity as there are no structures located within the side yard setback on other properties and there are otk
locations on the lot where the buildings could be const
which would not require a variance.
The reduction of the side yard setback would set an
undesirable precedent since no other lots in the vicini zone have such a reduction of setbacks.
6
4) That the granting of such variance could be materially 7
granting of this variance could potentially encourage a
detrimental to the public welfare as 20' of driveway i!
and because the proposed structure could create adversc 9
required to store an automobile in front of the garage
encroachment of parked vehicles into the public right (
impacts to the neighborhood. 10
11
12
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, hc
the 22nd day of September, 1982, by the following vote, to
77 13
14
15
16
1'7
18
19
AYES: Chairman Farrow, Commissioners Marcus, Rc
NOES: None .
ABSENT : None.
ABSTAIN : None .
Schlehuber, Jose, Friestedt and Rawlins.
(2/L i yGi-: \
VERNON J. ARROW, r. Cha CARLSRA ANNING COMMISSI
22
23
24
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER
25 11
26 I1 27
28 PC RES0 NO. 2021 .2