HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-11-03; Planning Commission; Resolution 2040f" 7. li e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2040
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING OF AN AMENDMENT TO !
USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM RESIDENTIAL I
AND RESIDENTIAL LOW-MEDIUM (RLM) DENSITIES TO RES:
MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (I
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF Pi
AIRPORT ROAD JUST EAST OF LAUREL TREE LANE.
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD LAND INVESTORS
CASE NO: GPA-64 (F)
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment t
8
Exhibit "A" I dated October 27, 1982, attached and incorporz 9
General Plan designation for certain property located as sk
10 herein, have been filed with the Planning Commission; and
11 WHEREAS, said verified applications constitute a L
12
relating to the General Plan Amendment. 21
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factor 20
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all per 19
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing, and 18
request; and 17
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider sai 16
October, 1982, and on the 3rd day of November, 1982, hold a 15
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 27th 14
Code; and 13
for amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Munic
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Com
23
26
B) That in view of the findings made and considering the 25
A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 24
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commissio
DENY GPA-64(F), as shown on Exhibit "A", dated October 1982, attached and incorporated herein, based on the f 27 findings:
28 ////
a " e
I. Findings:
e
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1) That the proposed amendment could have detrimental aff
the comprehensive general plan since the applicant has
provided adequate information to properly analyze pot6 impacts associated with the project.
2) That the proposed amendment could have detrimental aff the environment and adequate information has not been by the applicant to properly analyze these potential j associated with the project.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Planning Commission of the city of Carlsbad, California, hc
9 27th day of October, 1982, and on the 3rd day of November,
lo the following vote, to wit:
11
12
i3
14
15
16
17
AYES: Chairman Farrow, Commissioners Schlehube Rawlins, Rombotis, Jose and Friestedt.
NOES : None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Marcus.
ABSTAIN: None - qL/L*~&44A%L~&% :?,
VERNON J. FARROW, J
CARLSBAD P-LaNNING CO
.. . .,
l8 19 I ATTEST:
22 I/ 23
24
25
26 I1 27
28
PC RES0 NO. 2040 -2-