HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-11-09; Planning Commission; Resolution 2187t- h
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2187
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO PERMIT A CHURCH IN THE R-1-7500 ZONE ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON FUTURE McCAULEY LANE,
WEST OF THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF MONROE STREET AND ELM AVENUE.
APPLICANT: JEROVAH'S WITNESSES
CASE NO: CUP-236
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; an
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a re
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipa
Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 9th day of Novembe
1983, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said
application on property described as:
Parcel A of Parcel Map 1210 filed January 2, 1973 a
portion of Lots 30 and 31 according to Map 565 file
September 22, 1888.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pers
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to CUP-236.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY FSSOLVED by the Planni
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearj
the Commission DENIES CUP-236, based on the following
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings :
1) The proposed project will be detrimental to future resic
along McCauley Lane which would be permitted in the R-l-
zone as discussed in the staff report.
“- t 6 0
1
2
3
4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting o
5 Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he1
the 9th day of November, 1983, by the following vote, to wit
2) The proposed street system serving the proposed use is n
adequate to properly handle traffic generated by the pro
use because it is a cul-de-sac street serving a single f
neighborhood and the proposed church would create traffi
conflicts as discussed in the staff report.
6
7
8
AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Ccaranissioners Rombotis, -?brcus,
NOES: Cnmksioner Friestedt and Rawlins. Lyttleton.
9 /I ABSENT : Conmissioner Farrow.
10
11
ABSTAIN : None.
12
13
14
15
ATTEST :
i? rq j&V!Q- e wt”@---. (-r
CLIARENCE SCH~EHUBER, Chai
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISS
16
17 Land Use Planning Manager
18
19
2o I
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RES0 NO. 2187 -2-
II