Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-03-28; Planning Commission; Resolution 2267e. . /.A - , ’& 11 e Q 1 2 3 4 5 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2267 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT! CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PREANNEXATIONAL ZONE CHANGE TO 0 (OFFICE AND PROFEZ C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL), R-1-20,OOO and OS (OPEN 2 PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EL ( REAL, SOUTH OF COLLEGE BOULEVARD. APPLICANT: DEL MAR FINANCIAL CASE NO.: 2C-272 I ~ 7 Ij WHEREAS, a verified application for certain propert 811 wit: 9 10 Portions of Lot B and E of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in City of Carlsbad, according to Map thereof No. 823 Off ice of the County Recorder, filed May 1, 1915, C of San Diego, State of California, 11 provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 14 WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as 13 Planning Commission; and I.2 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to th relating to the Zone Change; and 21 desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 2o considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persc l9 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and 18 law to consider said request; and 17 March, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribe l6 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 28th da 15 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plannil 23 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 24 Commission as follows: B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hear: 25 the Commission recommends APPROVAL OF ZC-272, based on ’ 26 following findings and subject to the conditions contail 27 therein. 28 11 //// //// *' r3 * ii - 1" - I e 1 /I Findings: 2 for reasons stated in the staff report. 3 4 2) The proposed zone change is consistent with Specific PI 190 which implements both the General Plan and the Zoni the property as described in the staff report. !j 3) The project is consistent with all City public facility 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 l5 5) An Environmental Impact Report was recommended for 16 17 1) The proposed zone change is consistent with the General icies and ordinances since: a) The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an apF condition to this project, insured that the final n not be approved unless the City Council finds that service is available to serve the project. In addi the Planning Commission has added a condition that shall be placed on the final map that building perm not be issued for the project unless the City Engin determines that sewer service is available, and bui cannot occur within the project unless sewer servic remains available, and the Planning Commission is s that the requirements of the public facilities elem the general plan have been met insofar as they appl sewer service for this project. 4) The proposed zone change is consistent with all other e of the General Plan. certification for this project by the Planning Commissi March 28, 1984. The EIR identified impacts from the pr project. These impacts can either be mitigated or over considerations exist as described below. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I I I A. Traffic - The traffic section of the EIR indicates there will be a significant impact at the El Camin Real/College Boulevard and College Boulevard/A Str intersections if these roads are constructed to ge plan standards. These impacts will be mitigated b use of additional turn lanes on College Boulevard Camino Real, the construction of an additional sig the A Street/College Boulevard intersection, and t of two right-turn-only accesses connecting A Stree Camino Real south of College Boulevard. B. Land Use - The potential for a significant impact o use exists between the large commercial shopping ar future residential areas and between the proposed residential area at the east end of the project and approved Carlsbad Ridge Project. Both of these are shown for future development, requiring amendments Specific Plan and allowing for future review and conditions. Provisions of the Specific Plan requir landscaping to buffer the proposed commercial/offic from adjoining land uses. The future residential development would be restricted to no more than 2 d This lower density should ensure compatibility with neighboring residential uses. // DP Dpcn wn 33~7 c) "@ 'L .. 9'- L . e * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 C. Topography and Visual Aesthetics - Future developme proposed would result in significant alterations to existing landforms. Most of the trees associated w oak-woodland are being preserved as open space. Th project has been altered to preserve most of the hi area just southwest of the creek. Additional gradi landscaping and design measures have been incorpora the specific plan to reduce visual impact. D. Air Quality - Identified impacts on air quality wou have to be conisdered siqnificant based on the Reai Air Quality Strategies. -These impacts are cumulaci nature and true mitigation must occur on a regional basis. The benefits of the proposed project in pro employment opportunities and revenues would over-ri such cumulative aspects. E. Archaeology - Five archaeological sites were found project area which could be significantly affected development. These sites will be required to be mi by a qualified archaeologist as a condiition of the specific plan. F. Biology - The proposed project poses significant im the biological resources of the site. The project altered through the specific plan so the sensitive woodland area of the site will be fully preserved i natural open space. G. Hydrology and Water Quality - Development within thc year floodplain could cause significant impacts. Nc development is currently proposed in the floodplain Any development occuring in this area would be requ. to process a special use permit subject to future environmental review. H. Geology/Soils/Paleontology - Future development of property could be significantly affected by soil instability and development coLld also significantl; affect paleontological resources. A detailed geotechnical is being required prior to the issuancc building permits and a qualified paleontologist wil: required to monitor grading, pursuant to the Specif. Plan. 24 25 26 Conditions: 1 ) Approval is granted for ZC-272, as shown on Exhibit "X", January 5, 1984, incorporated by reference and on file j Land Use Planning Office. 27 11 //// //// 28 PC RES0 NO. 2267 -3- I -. " :c ~ *... L , 4 9 1 2) This project is approved upon the express condition thai Council Policy No. 17, dated April 2, 1982, on file wit1 to the agreements executed by the applicant for payment November 19, 1982 and February 25, 1983, are on file wil is not paid as promised, this application will not be shall be void. 2 City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference. If sa: 5 fee, a copy of those agreements, dated October 29, 1982, 4 City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and am 3 applicant shall pay a public facilities fee as required 6 7 consistent with the General Plan and approval for this 1 8 9 10 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting 01 Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held 28th day of March, 1984, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairman Rombotis, Commissioners Rawlins, 11 Schlehuber, Marcus, Lyttleton, Farrow and 12 ABSENT : None. 13 NOES : None. 14 15 16 17 ABSTAIN: None. I I I!ATTEST: 18 19 20 21. I 22 23 24 25 i 26 27 28 /!PC RES0 NO. 2267 -4- 11