HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-27; Planning Commission; Resolution 2308e
I. 11
2~
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2308
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN AMEND- MENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN FROM O/TS/OS TO RM/OS ON APPROXIMATELY
96 8 ACRES OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 78, APPROXIMATELY .5 MILES
EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL
APPLICANT: G & G ENTERPRISES
CASE NO.: GPA/LU 84-1
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment tc
General Plan designation for certain property located, as SI
Exhibit "X" , dated June 27, 1984, attached and incorporated
have been filed with the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified applications constitute a r(
for amendment as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Munic:
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 27th (
June, 1984, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribec
to consider said request;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all per:
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plannj
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That in view of the findings made and considering the
applicable law, the decision of the Planning Commissior DENIAL of GPA/LU 84-1, as shown on Exhibit ''X" , dated 5
1984
27
//// 28
////
0 0
1
1) The proposed RM land use designation is not appropriate 2
Findings:
the subject property for the following reasons, as disc 3 the staff report:
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o I
a) Potential environmental impacts associated with the project, including impacts on the riparian habitat
noise impacts on future residents, have not been mitigated,
b) The project would not be compatible with surroundin
uses including the riparian habitat, Highway 78, th Coast Asphalt Plant and existing and future residen
developments.
~ 2) Substantial justification, to support the requested ame
~ has not been presented, as discussed in the Staff repor
3) The Land Use Planning Manager has determined that the
environmental impacts of this project have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, issued a Notice
Prior Compliance, June 11, 1984.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting o
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, he1
27th day of June, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Chairman Rombotis, Commissioners Rawlins, I
NOES : Commissioner McFadden.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
Farrow, Schlehuber and Smith.
21
22
23
H
24 ATTEST : I1
25
26
%
LAND USE PLANNING MANAGER 27
28
PC RES0 NO. 2308 -2-