HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-01-08; Planning Commission; Resolution 2489B-l e !B
1 I1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 2489
2
3
4
5
6
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND CONDO-
MINIUM PERMIT FOR 18 UNITS ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
LUCIERNAGA STREET, AT THE FIRST UNDEVELOPED
PROPERTY EAST OF CEBU STREET.
APPLICANT: CASA LOMA CONDOS
CASE NO: CT 84-43/CP-302
7 /I WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to
8 11 wit:
9
LO
x' has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Lots 393 and 394 of La Costa Meadows Unit No. 2, in the
County of San Diego, State of California, according to
Nap thereof No. 6905, filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of San Diego, April 21, 1971,
12 ;/Planning Cornmission; and
13
l4
15
as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
Decemberp 1985, an on the 8th day of January, 1986, hold a duly l6
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 11th day of
l7
request; and l8
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, to consider said
19 I WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
2o
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 21
considering a11 testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
22
23
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit; and
27
(B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, 26
' (A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 25
Commission as follows: 24
I
I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
the Commission DENIES CT-84-43/CP-302, without prejudice,
based on the following findings:
28 ////
//// I I
I1
tr P *
1 Findings:
2 1) The project is not consistent with the City's General Plan i because it does not meet the criteria in the Land Use Element j
3 to justify 12 du's/acre, I 4 2) The site is not physically suitable for the type and density ~ of the development since a steep slope exists which constrains i
5 development and density on the site. 1
6 3) The proposed project is not consistent with the City's Planned Development Ordinance because the project design is not
7
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 8
compatible with site constraints.
9 Planning Commission of the City of' Carlsbad, California, held on
10 the 8th day of January, 1986, by the following vote, to wit:
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 11
AYES : Chairman Schlehuber, Commissioners: Marcus I McFadden, Holmes, Hall , Smith & MCBane
NOES : None ,
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
@- h ,/ B
df 1 i/ ~- "
CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Chairman
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
\
I I
20
21 PLANNING DIRECTOR
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 PC RES0 NO 2489 -2-
I i I I I
~