HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-09-21; Planning Commission; Resolution 2766"
1
2
3
4
5
e e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2766
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 87-6, TO DEVELOP A THREE UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARLSBAD
BOULEVARD BETWEEN CHERRY AND JUNIPER AVENUES. APPLICANT: BABCOCK
CASE NO: SDP 87-6
6
of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission: and 7
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City
8 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as
g provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: and
10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code,
11
considered said request on property described as: 12
the Planning Commission did, on the 21st day of September, 1988,
13
14
Lot 0, Block 2, Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad, California
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and l5l1 considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to Site Development Plan 87-6.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission DENIES without prejudice SDP 87-6, based on
the following findings:
Findinss:
1. The proposed apartment project does not comply with the
development standards and design guidelines of the Beach
Area Overlay Zone because: (1) the open visitor parking
spaces are not setback the required minimum five feet from
the building, (2) the proposed structure reflects a large,
monolithic building rather than a small scale structure,
28
- I1 0 *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
and (3) the building is not stepped back from the street, and has little vertical horizontal and roof articulation of
the building face.
2. Because of the structure's mass and stark appearance, other
Beach Area design goals regarding pedestrian orientation and
preservation of views through the site have not been
complied with.
3. The proposed project exceeds the growth control point of 19
du/acre and does not incorporate adequate design features
and amenities to justify approval above the Growth Control
Point.
4. The project applicant has not been able to obtain an
adequate site access.
9 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
10
the 21st day of September, 1988, by the following vote,, to wit: 11
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
12 AYES : Chairperson McFadden, Commissioners: Hall, Schramm, Marcus, Schlehuber, Erwin and Holmes.
13
14
15
16
17
18 SBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
NOES : None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
19 ATTEST :
20
21 MICHAEL J. HOLZMIL'EER 22
23
PLANNING DIRECTOR
25
24
26
PC RES0 NO. 2766 27 1 -2-
28